• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Definitely bring it to an electronics recycling center, rather than sending it to a landfill. Shame on them for recommending that.

    • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s bad wording from the article. The actual Spotify support page says this:

      We recommend resetting your Car Thing to factory settings and safely disposing of your device following local electronic waste guidelines. Contact your state or local waste disposal department to determine how to dispose of or recycle Car Thing in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    They need to give it a software update that essentially turns it into your average car entertainment system, with support for local files, AirPlay (and whatever the Android equivalent is… casting?), and other streaming services including Spotify (even the garbage free version), oh, and CDs too, with metadata. I mean, this thing is pretty good at modernizing older cars to an extent, why did they suddenly choose to get rid of it completely?

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well I would like the option to use it as a simple media control. It only has 500 mb RAM so it’s not going to do well with a lot of local media playback

    • maeries@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      We really need a law for that. They should have to either

      • buy them back
      • make sure they work for a sufficiently long time after the last unit was sold (e.g. 5 years)
      • make the software open source so the community can maintain the software (if even possible, cause the community won’t be able to work on the server side)
      • release an offline patch that makes the device work even after servers have been shut down if that makes sense for the device in question (applies mostly to always-online single player games)
  • nicerdicer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What a waste of resources. Millions of devices will now add to the landfill, despite nothing is wrong with them in terms of technical funtionality. Just because Spotify wants them do be discontinued.

    It should be law that when a manufacturer decides on discontinuing an otherwise fully functional product in such way, they should be forced to publish the source code of the software used for the respective device as well as any other resources for free so that users of these devices at least have a chance to repurpose it.

    This also stands for any “smart” / internet-of-things-devices where the main functionality is reliing on the operation of a server. When the servers discontinue their services your device is basically a brick with no other functionality.

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Short answer is GPL3 doesn’t just require source disclosure for the software delivered but also software or firmware that it requires to function.

          So say a network video player under GPL2 would require release of the player source code to whoever you give a copy of the player software to you wouldn’t have to give the source code to the video server that it needs to work with because you didn’t give them a copy of the server.

          GLP3 would require you to also give the server code. So if the car thing was under GLP3 they would have to give the server code and people could run their own server for it.

          That’s a simple explanation. In reality it’s more complicated but that’s the gist.