• Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    First, since they’ve already said they have no further intention of pursuing sentencing, his ruling is just meaningless fluff to feed to people who still want to believe that the rule of law even remotely matters when it comes to Trump.

    Second, Trump’s ego is all that matters. Most likely, he’s still going to demand exoneration either by some kind of act of Congress, executive order, or simply judge-shopping until he finds a judge that will interfere in the case based on the legal theory of because fuck you that’s why, possibly followed by having Merchan investigated or brought up on bullshit “election interference”, “treason”, or “corruption” charges. And probably his daughter too.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolutely nothing, they have already said they are not pursuing sentencing during his presidential term, so he is free from all consequences until he dies.

      • DokPsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honest question, what is the GOP going to do when his 4 years is over assuming that he doesn’t pull a Putin and just stay in power until usurped or killed. They’ve gone so far into him as the leader that any challenger is disowned from the party so what happens if they follow the law and he no longer is able to run?

        • plz1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          The “speedy trial” guarantee is for the defendant. If they want it slower, there is no guarantee the government has to “speed it up”. That’s his strategy on pretty much every lawsuit, delay as long as possible.

          • CM400@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m very clearly not a lawyer or expert in any way here, but once he’s convicted doesn’t that change things? He’s no longer on trial, he has a conviction hanging over his head, seem inhumane to me to force someone to wait for a sentence/punishment. It would be one thing to let him wait until after his term to serve time or pay a fine, but not knowing what the punishment is seems very wrong to me.

  • _bcron@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Makes sense considering many protections don’t extend to civil matters, and he wasn’t even acting in any sort of governmental role at neither the time of the incident which compelled him to make the payment nor at the time of the payment itself.

    The payment happened in October and this may be a shitty analogy but imo it’s like someone running a dozen red lights because they’re late to a police officer job interview. I mean, it may help them get the job but they’re acting as a private citizen and not in any sort of governmental capacity and it’d be absolutely bonkers for them to argue that they should retroactively have any sort of immunity on the basis that they did in fact get the job