• Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    "capitalism is a horrible system that tried to bankrupt my family though medical expenses.

    But don’t fight it, support it by giving them your money anyway, and then any that you earn after that.

    You are a fool of you don’t buckle to the whims of big business"

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Buddy, bro, my pal, finance friend.

    Nvidia went up 350% over the past year. You should have written a fake story about videogames.

      • pazzeda@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        She needed a new graphics card. The salespeople there urged her to buy the brand new Nvidia 4090 for $1500.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Damn, $1500 is actually a great price for a 4090. If only…

          Edit: I don’t know how I got here. I just realized this post is 4 months old.

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Are you fucking joking that a hospital is on the stock market? I know, its the company that owns the hospital, but its still fucked up. Should not be allowed.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why not? Companies that make pharmaceuticals, prosthetics, imaging devices, etc are all on the stock market too, so if hospitals weren’t on there, you could build a portfolio to approximate it by buying producers of medical equipment.

      The real issue isn’t whether something is publicly traded, but collusion between groups to keep prices high. For example, it’s mutually beneficial for insurance, hospitals, and medical equipment providers to increase costs. Higher equipment costs means care providers can charge more (what’s another few hundred when the bill is in the thousands?), and higher total bills means insurance companies can charge higher premiums (they’re usually limited to a certain percent of cost as profit). Hospitals generally don’t have direct competitors since it’s prohibitively expensive to build one and there’s lots of bureaucracy based on “need,” so you can’t just go next door to an org that’s not involved in the collusion.

      Here’s some YouTube videos about it:

      There are lots of viable solutions here, but banning them from the stock market isn’t going to solve anything. The first order of business imo is making everything more transparent.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I disagree.

          I know it’s an anecdote, but I have a coworker that shared an experience moving from Canada to the US, and they said they much prefer the American healthcare system to the Canadian system. This is from the perspective of a relatively well off individual (not rich, just middle to upper middle class), so obviously someone at the bottom end of the income spectrum would have a different opinion.

          So my question for people who promote socialized medicine is this: if you could easily afford both, would you prefer socialized or privatized medicine? And why?

          I think we have a cost problem, not a structural problem, so we should look at ways of reducing cost before completely changing the structure of our healthcare system. My primary concern is getting insurance away from employers, publicly funding emergency services, and making hospital costs more transparent (e.g. publicly posted price ranges for common procedures). As in, reform the current system, not replace it.