• redballooon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This link doesn’t support the claim that the UN called these events a genocide. It lists all sorts of human rights violations on a massive scale, but it doesn’t use the word genocide.

        I suppose the crux of the matter is that it was the USA, not the UN, and then some of its close allies who named the events a “genocide”.

        After this the frontiers harden, nobody talks any more about the actual events, but about the terminology.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The UN can’t classify acts as genocides as per its rules. However, it can supply resources for independent international organisations to come to their own conclusions, in which case, most classify it as a genocide.

      • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        UN is not calling it a genocide though? The entire report your link refers to does not mention genocide. It does make a clear point of massive discrimination etc though ä.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The UN can’t classify acts as genocides as per its rules. However, it can supply resources for independent international organisations to come to their own conclusions, in which case, most classify it as a genocide.

    • yata@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That is what the genocide denier wants you to think. It obviously isn’t a semantics argument though.

      • BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I still wouldn’t base my entire opinion on someone over one discussion regarding whether something is or isn’t a genocide. I hope he doesn’t like diet coke or chew with his mouth open.

  • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll never understand anybody who isn’t skeptical of what America tries to say about it’s enemies anymore. I don’t know if there’s a genocide happening in China. But most of the world except the United States seems to think there isn’t. And that’s a big fucking red flag to me.

    If there is one happening and people are being propagandized into denying it, I blame the United States whole heartedly for the embarrassing amount of disinformation they shit out on a daily basis about China.

    • Slotos@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll never understand this US-centric, bigoted dismissal of anyone and everyone through the lens of American exceptionalism.

      You are the problem you so loudly complain about.

    • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait you blame the US for you denying the Uyghurs are being wiped, because checks notes they’re telling you about it ?

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And this most of the world is…?

      Because the United Nations most certainly recognises the genocide, as do many other independent human-rights organisations. oh and the leaked documents.