• DarkMessiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    “Whatever happened with the ozone layer panic, if scientists are so smart?”

    We listened to the scientists, and the problem went away.

        • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          As a kiwi, the amount of sunburn I get every summer would imply it hasn’t.

      • MechanicalJester@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, also the massive SO2 that Mt Pinatubo put into the atmosphere slowly went away. And the CFCs.

        Pinatubo created more sulfur emissions during its eruption than 10 years of all human coal burning.

        And also on top of that we were also wrecking the Ozone.

        Nature can always make our mistakes much much worse.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s the same as people using the example of the Y2K bug being a non event. Yeah, because globally trillions of dollars were spent fixing it before it became an event.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Was there ever really a threat to begin with? The whole thing sounds like Jewish space lasers to me.

        Edit: Gotta love getting downvoted for asking a question.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Similar with Y2K — it was only a nothingburger because it was taken seriously, and funded well. But the narrative is sometimes, “yeah lol it was a dud.”

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      All this hysteria over nuclear weapons is overblown. We’ve known how to build them for 75 years yet there hasn’t been a single one detonated on inhabited American soil. They’re harmless

    • FractalsInfinite@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The question is, what will happen in 2038 when y2k happens again due to an integer overflow? People are already sounding the alarm but who knows if people will fix all of the systems before it hits.

    • Trantarius@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Y2K specifically makes no sense though. Any reasonable way of storing a year would use a binary integer of some length (especially when you want to use as little memory as possible). The same goes for manipulations; they are faster, more memory efficient, and easier to implement in binary. With an 8-bit signed integer counting from 1900, the concerning overflows would occur in 2028, not 2000. A base 10 representation would require at least 8 bits to store a two digit number anyway. There is no advantage to a base 10 representation, and there never has been. For Y2K to have been anything more significant than a text formatting issue, a whole lot of programmers would have had to go out of their way to be really, really bad at their jobs. Also, usage of dates beyond 2000 would have increased gradually for decades leading up to it, so the idea it would be any sort of sudden catastrophe is absurd.

  • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I literally had this exact exchange with someone last year, when they tried to cast doubt on global warming by comparing it to the ozone. Another person did the same , using acid rain, and I pointed out that the northeast sued the shit out of the Midwest until they cut that shit with the coal fire power plants.

    • Yaztromo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The Conservative Party led Canadian Government and the Regan-era Republican US Government started working on the US-Canada Air Quality Agreement, which was signed by the George H.W. Bush administration into law in the US (and the Brian Mulroney led Government of Canada).

      That’s right — two Conservative governments identified a problem, listened to their scientists, and enacted a solution to acid rain. And now the problem has virtually disappeared.

      Oh how low Conservatives have fallen on both sides of the border since those days.

  • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    TBH “The whole world agreed on something” narrative doesn’t really reflect what happened.

    Actually, The Industry dropped using CFC after a cheaper and luckily safer alternative has been discovered right around that time.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Lemmy auto sorts by “active” so my responding to you will now keep it at the top of your page for day 3 lol

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    And didn’t they find a bunch of Chinese factories pumping them out again not long ago?