• yamsham@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is not an American invention, nor is it interchangeable with a roundabout.

      The main priority of roundabouts is safe traffic flow for cars, but they can (sometimes) still be very hostile to pedestrians. This type of intersection is meant to prioritize pedestrians as much as possible. The narrow street slows vehicles, and the sidewalk bump outs make people trying to cross the street extra visible and minimize the time they need to be vulnerable in the middle of the road.

      Which isn’t to say that roundabouts are necessarily bad, they just serve different purposes

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yep. I visited London for the first time last summer. They have protected pedestrian crossings everywhere and it’s really nice. A very walkable city.

  • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Am I the only one who thinks that the design decision to eliminate the ability for cars to both cross Dexter or make left turns anywhere is a deliberate choice to create driver frustration and reduce favorable attitudes towards building more of these?

    Normal protected intersections are terrific and allow automotive traffic to flow in all directions. What was the thought process here?

    • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think the idea is to discourage drivers from using Thomas, and try to make it the main east-west bike corridor in the area.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Stopping people from driving directly to where they want to go reduces traffic apparently.

      They use it very deliberately in larger cities to just make driving downtown a hassle.

      If it’s just a bit more annoying, people are less inclined to do it.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m confused about what is street level and what is curb level but I do like how it appears to prioritize safety of pedestrians and cyclists over everything

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Bit annoying that bikes have to wait for two separate crossing signals to turn, but overall, it looks a lot safer.

        • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Where I live they rarely wait for one, or even pay any attention to traffic signals at all, for that matter. They seem to have an issue with the whole “sharing the road means we have to follow the same rules, otherwise I have no idea what you’re going to do or when you’re going to do it, and that’s how accidents happen” concept.