• Forester@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The US Navy has had functional Small modular reactor designs mostly PWR designs since the 1960s in the 5mw to 500mw range with no major failures yet.

    • JGcEowt4YXuUtkBUGHoN@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The problem is that none of these designs have ever been used to power the grid. Every nuclear project in the recent past has blown by cost and time estimates. Wind and solar are not only cheaper than nukes, they can also be installed much quicker and predictably. Nukes have a place, but we need clean energy now.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wind and solar are great, but they cannot provide consistent 24 hours base load production. Even with massive battery farms, they cannot replace bas load consistently.

        That’s where nuclear needs to be, replacing the base load production currently being handled via coal and natural gas.

        • JGcEowt4YXuUtkBUGHoN@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The US at least already has enough nuclear to handle base loads when solar and wind are unavailable. Nukes in some contexts are needed, but I believe we have 30% or so nukes in the US. Diverting resources to new nukes is a waste when we could be making carbon fuels unprofitable soon by investing in solar and wind.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes. Operated on a military budget. There’s a reason they’re not used for civilian use.