• systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    45
    ·
    4 months ago

    An event that’s supposed to bring people together, instead purposely creates division. I’m agnostic af, but I can clearly see this is bad taste.

    If you like creating division, then by all means celebrate it I guess…

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      They included everyone who has been excluded from the beginning and made a statement that they will not pander to those who want them excluded anymore. Those who were angry at this are those who wanted to keep these people excluded. I’d say it’s a pace in a good direction to bring people together. There is only a group of people who will need to learn they can’t force their way on others anymore.

      For crying out loud had these people had their way again we wouldn’t even have had that badass metal music show in front of the Bastille Conciergerie, where Marie Antoinette was trialed and sentenced to death.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        badass metal music show in front of the Bastille.

        Didn’t realize that was in front of the Bastille, you can’t get more anti authoritarian than that.

        • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          My bad, the building it took place at was La Conciergeie, which is the location where Marie Antoinette was trialed and sentenced to death. The Bastille no longer exists.

          But I mean, the anti-authoritarian vibe immediately peaked at the beginning with a beheaded Marie-Antoinette singing about hanging the aristocrats.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s the agnostics who want to force our churches to go woke in Europe.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          The other way around. It’s the agnostics who defend your right to do whatever you want inside your church, as long as it isn’t illegal. It’s outside your stupid church you don’t get to say or command anything. And that’s what offends religious folks. Losing the power to force others to obey your religion is not oppression, leave us the fuck alone.

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 months ago

              Learn to read. “the Archbishop of Canterbury’s views have sway around the Commonwealth and beyond […] the Lords Spiritual number 26 votes in our unelected upper chamber of parliament. These people still have power. ” That’s a religious issue within that religion that affects non-religious people. You see how that reinforces my point? I don’t fucking care whatever the the church end up deciding to do because I don’t fucking belong to that church and therefore that stupid church has no power over my life. But when the assholess inside the church influence civil decisions, then that becomes a problem. Either get out of political life, or change and accept that your worldview not only sucks, but isn’t supported anymore.

      • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        No no, you don’t get it. They don’t like drag, and we should’ve known christian’s don’t like drag and wouldn’t want to go to a drag show. So by us doing them anyways, knowing they won’t be there, we’re excluding them by not excluding them while they exclude themselves. We’re the assholes y’all.

    • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The only people creating division are religious people who can’t switch off their offended brain for once and laugh a little.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        Same logic can be applied to people being (rightfully) outraged at blackface

        • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Since you bring up logic, the logical fallacy you’re displaying is called the false equivalence fallacy. Blackface is outrageous because the purpose is to demonize and humiliate black people. The purpose of drag is to CELEBRATE freedom of feminine expression, regardless of sex/gender. One is inherently exclusive, while the other is inherently inclusive.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            And the purpose of mocking Christianity is…? I didn’t mention drag here.

            • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              You’re dissenting in a thread about Christians hating drag. It’s implied you’re talking about drag. Further, blackface is a common dog whisle the alt-right uses to attempt to demonize drag.

              I haven’t mocked Christians in a very long time. Some people are mocking Christians, but the intent of the original performance, and the intent of this thread, is very clearly to mock people that USE Christianity as ammunition against people and things they don’t like. Which is (obviously) an exclusionary act… Which the Olympics is against, given that it exists to bring people with differences together… Hence, the performance…

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Drag !== LGBT.

        LGBT is Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, three sexual orientations, and Transgender- a modifier of gender expression.

        Drag is a performance.

    • le cat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      if you have to conform to what a single group wants while ignoring the actual countries who created the games and those who host them, that’s not”bringing people together” it’s just giving in to narrow views and acting as if only one group has legitimacy and the right to decide on anything. there is no “bringing together” of different people and things in that.