Donald Trump has backed away somewhat from his earlier commitment to debate Vice President Kamala Harris, questioning the value of a meetup and saying he “probably” will debate but he “can also make a case for not doing it.”
That’s Trump’s argument (democrats might change their candidate yet again) but with her gaining clear popularity in many swing states, it’s very difficult to make the argument that “she is not important”.
But lets say for argument’s sake that Kamala is so bad and unpopular that he is guaranteed to win the election and debating her is not worth his time, why bother with rallies then?
That’s Trump’s argument (democrats might change their candidate yet again) but with her gaining clear popularity in many swing states, it’s very difficult to make the argument that “she is not important”.
But lets say for argument’s sake that Kamala is so bad and unpopular that he is guaranteed to win the election and debating her is not worth his time, why bother with rallies then?