• m4@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m with you - I was kind of happy with GNOME2 back in the day, but the forecoming of what was going to be GNOME3 made me jump out that ship and became a refugee in KDE.

    It’s a shame the Linux ports of Chrome and Firefox are written in GTK because of the reasons you mentioned. Once I heard some guy at GNOME talking about porting Firefox directly to Wayland - which sounds kind of bollocks for a pedestrian like me - but if it’s possible, I hope that they succeed and Firefox can become a toolkit-agnostic web browser.

    But at the same time I wonder about projects like Xfce and if they ever decide to move away from GTK, like LXDE did. I mean, a fusion between Xfce and Enlightenment would be awesome.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      porting Firefox directly to Wayland

      I’m trying to understand what that even means.

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      GNOME always seemed to be a solution chasing a problem, particularly once the licensing fears for Qt/KDE were settled.

      But now it’s one of the things Red Hat seems to impose on the world. Feels like everything controversial comes out of them or Canonical. I guess they have the commercial cash to prop up things like GNOME and Wayland and systemd and snaps until they gain traction, while more community-focused products can’t break the world for no reason.