- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
deleted by creator
Did you not read the article?
American citizenship was not an aspiration for the first peoples of the United States, whose primary political allegiance was to their own nations.
Meanwhile, as I’ve covered in my research and teaching on federal Indian law, the Indian Citizenship Act was not a gift or benefit to Native Americans. It was part of a coercive larger effort to assimilate Native Americans into U.S. society.
From nation to assimilation For centuries after Europeans colonized North America in the 16th century, Native Americans sought to remain separate and distinct from the settlers.
I can just imagine what the news articles would be if natives were not given citizenship and voting rights and limited to independent tribal areas. This is funny because someone just said something about this with palestinians in the reverse but of course if it happened then israel would have to formally become one state the way the US is one state.
deleted by creator
You should approach the beliefs of foreign cultures which you don’t understand with curiousity and open-mindedness, not debate.
They are not mutually exclusive, and respectful debate benefits everyone. The debate being whether federal U.S. citizenship for natives is a net positive or negative.
In the current political scenario, I don’t see anyone arguing it’s a net negative.
Why would they need to vote for a government that shouldn’t have jurisdiction over them in the first place?
Should or not is an academic question. The fact is that it has jurisdiction.
Removed by mod
Why do articles like this have stupid titles? US citizenship is never “forced” on anyone. There would have been frequent and loud complaints if American Indians were not granted citizenship.
