You may have noticed a distinct lack of return2ozma. This is due to their admitting, in a public comment, that their engagement here is in bad faith:

I’m sure there will be questions, let me see if I can address the most obvious ones:

  1. Can I still post negative stuff about Biden?

Absolutely! We have zero interest in running an echo chamber. However, if ALL you’re posting is negative, you may want to re-think your priorities. You get out of the world what you put into it and all that.

  1. Why now?

Presumption of innocence. It may be my own fault, but I do try to think the best of people, and even though they were posting negative articles, they weren’t necessarily WRONG. Biden’s poll numbers, particularly in minority demographics ARE in the shitter. They are starting to get better, but he still has a hell of a hill to climb.

  1. Why a 30 day temp ban and not a permanent ban?

The articles return2ozma shared weren’t bad, faked, or from some wing-nut bias site like “beforeitsnews.com”, they were legitimate articles from established and respected news agencies, pointing out the valid problems Biden faces.

The problem was ONLY posting the negatives, over and over and then openly admitting that dishonest enagement is their purpose.

Had they all been bullshit articles? It would not have taken anywhere near this much time to lay the ban and it would have been permanent.

30 days seems enough time for them to re-think their strategery and come back to engage honestly.

tl;dr - https://youtu.be/C6BYzLIqKB8#t=7s

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Unsurprising to see the usual suspects agitating on this issue in the comments section.

    I honestly don’t know how I feel about this, other than that a temp ban is better than a perma-ban. Ozma is annoying as shit, but that’s not a strong admittance of bad faith, even if it’s obvious by his posting to anyone with functioning eyes. At the same time, he does nothing but continuously post this dreck, and a community necessarily must trim bad-faith actors to maintain itself. Otherwise you end up with a shithole like 4chan.

    I don’t know. I’m glad it’s not my call.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s tough you know? I can’t tell you how many times I looked at reports and gave them the benefit of doubt, then hit this one and was like “Ok, yup, it’s time.”

      Looking at the coments here there’s lots on both sides, folks who are like “yeah, I blocked him ages ago!” to “how dare you!”

      FWIW, I’ve been in touch with them in PMs, there’s no hard feelings on either side, we’ll see how it shakes out when they’re back.

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Mostly right there with you. It’s disturbing to see mods just publicly admitting their process is capricious and wack expecting to be congratulated and lauded for openness.

      I never thought I’d be posting AMAB next to a lib.