• qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s unfortunately not really a contradiction though, given the electoral college — I think Harris will obliterate Trump in the popular, but that’s sadly not what matters.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again.

      If The Superbowl had a roughly 1/5 chance of the winner being declared the loser because of a technicality, we would burn this shit to the ground. Yet, here we are with roughly 1/5 of all presidential elections being overturned by the EC.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Right. But I think it’s a mischaracterization to represent the EC as a “technicality,” as it’s very central to the way voting in the USA works. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s stupid and should be abolished, but it’s very much ingrained in the voting system.

        I think I’d counter your example — keeping the sports theme — by saying it’s like the World Series: it doesn’t matter if there are three absolute blowouts, all the matters is who wins four games. So you could easily win the World Series, but have fewer total runs across seven games (game = EC votes, runs = popular).

        (Again, I think the EC should absolutely be abolished.)