• littlecolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you can’t see how blatant it is, I don’t know what to tell you. You can be all “it’s just SIMILAR wink wink” all you want. Similar is a fucking understatement.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Have you played Pokémon and PalWorld? One is a pit-fighter-trainer where the other is a base-builder. Or does the capturing of creatures and the similar art style make them too much alike?

      In a truly competitive capitalist market there should be room enough for both. But Nintendo wants their players to be obligated to own only Nintendo approved products.

      • littlecolt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Have you? The monster designs, some of them are straight up copycats and pallette swaps and such. Others are basically that “ok copy my homework, but don’t make it identical so we don’t get in trouble.”. It is absolutely pushing the limits. To say you do not see that is willful. It has to be.

    • Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Okay. You don’t like the word “similar” I guess. What word would you use?

      It is certainly not the same.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Pokemon concept and ideas are heavily borrowed already. It is pretty idiotic to pretend they created anything. Instead they copied a bunch of Japanese culture and now want to prevent others from doing the same.