I don’t have yet any preferences. Cheap, easy to set up, secure. What do you use and can recommend?

  • maxgyver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Reolink. Cheap, good enough quality, great HA integration, no internet connection needed.

    • Tinkerer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      +1 they are completely local, cheap and have a tight integration with home assistant, I have 5 of their cameras.

    • adONis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      can these be configured to stream TO a remote frigate server?

      Example: I’d like to install one at my parent’s house, connect it to my parent’s wifi, but have it stream to frigate, that’s hosted on my server in another city?

      • maxgyver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        i had frigate running locally and could integrate them. That said i grabbed the stream from the local network. I guess you would need some sort of local pi to forward the streams. But that is well above my pay grade ^^ sorry

        • adONis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, I’ve already heard about such a solution, where I’d need a Pi that acts as the streaming client, which then should work with any camera.

  • philpo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not cheap but easy to setup and very very capable are the Dahuas. Especially in HA they are really mighty. But sadly they are not cheap.

  • brownmustardminion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I use Amcrest PoE dome cameras with frigate. Quality and price are excellent. My only complaints would be the dome cameras get dirty fast and at night the IR light from inside reflects off of the dirt and makes them useless. Frigate also seems pretty bad at detecting things in night vision mode. And yes, I’ve already made the recommended adjustments in my frigate config.

    • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I use Amcrest, mostly because the guy who makes frigate recommended them, and has affiliate links on his site. As a software developer myself, I have to say frigate (and HA) are two jewels of open source software and so I’m happy to support them however I can.

      That being said, the cameras work well and are easy to integrate with both frigate and HA. They all try to phone home at first, but stop if you tell them to (I’ve confirmed this by monitoring the traffic on my dns servers).

      I couldn’t find a privacy friendly wifi camera with a big enough battery to run continuously, so I ended up building my own with a solar panel, an inverter, and a 9ah lithium battery that sits on a fence post at the end of my driveway. It was a fun project, but I wish I could buy it.

      Another small gripe is that the PTZ cameras from Amcrest all seem to be crazy expensive or have mixed reviews, so I’ve just held off on those for now.

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve got amcrest and I integrate them into HA via mqtt using blue iris.

      But amcrest cameras need something like pihole to help block all their taking to the home base

    • Convict45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’ve owned a bunch of Foscam cameras, a sub-brand owned by Amcrest.

      Amcrest and its Foscam sub-brand seem very interested in getting access to your cameras, have less capable and less convenient software, and the cameras themselves seem less well built than Reolink.

      I bought a half a dozen V1 Wyze cams, and at least two of them have failed. I won’t touch that brand again. I also would never have used Wyze at all except for the exploit that allowed custom firmware installation for real local access and control.