• lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re breathing more intensely than usual, so there is some overhead. But then again walking would take longer and may produce more carbon overall for the same distance

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Interestingly research actually shows electric bikes to have less of a carbon footprint than manual bikes even when accounting for the electricity, battery, motor, etc. due to the rider needing to consume fewer calories to provide the muscle power. But we’re talking numbers so small that it’s really not worth worrying about in the grander scheme of things. So if you’re feeling some guilt about the extra components in your ebike you don’t need to, but if you’re looking at an ebike to replace your regular one don’t make the decision purely based on carbon footprint, but instead focus on if you need/want it.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Carbon footprint is a term that was made up by oil companies to shift blame from them to us.

    • ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Doesn’t change the fact that some forms of travel are objectively worse for the environment than others. If you can reasonably take a train or a bus instead of a plane or car, you should do so.