• commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I did watch that video. probably a dozen times. it gets posted often. I shouldn’t be expected to debunk an argument that isn’t made.

    I rewatched* it after I made my comment though, and it does not establish what they claimed. it doesn’t cite sources**, and it’s primary thesis is “it’s complicated”

    edit(s):

    * i actually listened to it. but just now, after i made this comment, i scrubbed it and i found:

    ** they do some pretty hard-to-see and also hard-to-research citation in the form of citing academic papers in the bottom right of the screen around the time they are making the claim. and let me tell you, poore-nemecek is the basis of the lca analysis (which i could have guessed), and that lca analysis is flat out bad science. it’s certainly not a compelling reason to be vegan.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Those are very fair objections and that video isn’t perfect - I was only objecting to your apparent refusal to consume a video. A lot of content these days is produced in video form so it’s not reasonable to reject an argument based on media - some topics just aren’t well expressed in a written form.

      But, TL;DR I wasn’t criticizing your opinion or decision - just the common response of rejecting something based on the media it’s presented in.