Just watched it; I think it was a good movie for a deep study of a unreliable narrator and that external support was gated on playing a role. Fill a roll or fall through the cracks, and lose people’s good will, since you no longer are the idea they like.

As a joker follow up movie, it was a massive miss, and probably wasted people’s time who went to watch it.

Just came back from it, I regret sleeping on La La Land, because had I watched it, I would have skipped Joker 2

Disjointed mess that you can expect from a writing session based around a singer, an actor, and a director, that hated their original movie’s audience, scribbling on napkins, to make.

It feels like the producers told them it still had to be a joker film and that’s where you get the makeup and action set pieces from but they get ignored every time for excuses that are basically “because we shouldn’t tell this story, we think, we will sorta berate you, and give you no reason to watch this as it’s all fake”

I just realized it’s still a rip off of Scorsese and like a literal reverse of “Shutter Island”

deleted by creator

I hate to see dead threads so I’ll start… critics said it was… Boring… Is that true?