The world’s first ovarian cancer vaccine could wipe the disease out, researchers have said.

OvarianVax is a vaccine that teaches the immune system to recognise and attack the earliest stages of ovarian cancer.

It’s being developed by scientists at the University of Oxford.

The hope is that women could receive the jab preventatively on the NHS with the goal of eradicating the disease.

Experts have suggested it could work in a similar way to the human papillomavirus (HPV) jab, which is on track to stamp out cervical cancer.

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is great news. Yet, sadly, I am drawn to wondering who will complain about this the loudest. Will it be misogynists who say “they’re not helping men with their cancer”, or anti-vaxxers saying “this vaccine will actually CAUSE cancer”?

    What about people who are both misogynist and anti-vaccine?

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Well at least ovarian cancer isn’t airborne and contagious like covid. So antivaxxers can avoid it all they want, it’s their choice if they want to die from a disease that they could’ve prevented.

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a good thing we invented this straw person to have this whole discussion artificially when literally no one else was bringing it up. If we can’t find any monsters I guess we’ll invent them and do it anyway. 🙄

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        It’s a good thing we invented this straw person

        So, neither misogynists nor anti-vaxxers exist?

        I can find you evidence of men complaining about free period products. I am certain there will be men complaining that female cancers are getting cures, and not male ones.

    • lmaydev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Fuck em, essentially. Rather have cancer than a vaccine, that’s their choice. It’s not until it’s a required vaccine that it makes much difference.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Fuck em, essentially.

        Yes, that’s the attitude that people have as they make the world worse. It’s not the best attitude.

        • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No it isn’t. People have a basic level of accountability. If someone doesn’t want a life saving vaccine because they’re too ignorant to understand the science behind our bodies, no amount of oration will convince them otherwise. So yeah. Fuck em.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What about people who are both misogynist and anti-vaccine?

      $10 says Alex Jones and his troglodyte cult following are gonna have a field day 😮‍💨

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, I knew it. Here come the sad sacks with the useless “this is good news, but…”

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        I’m an academic working to analyse hate speech, with a particular focus on online misogyny. As bigotry is illogical, common features of communications of that hatred is stuff that is wholly made up. This include the idea that men are being short-changed by a medical industry which prioritise female health. This is factually untrue, in terms of gender differences in health outcomes.

        If knowing about the truth makes me a ‘sad sack’, fine. Maybe being correct and ‘sad’ is more important than being incorrect yet happy.