Update, yes there are snipers:

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nixon invades Cambodia, campuses across the country erupt in protest, armed troops deployed to deal with the unrest on an Ohio campus, guns pointed at students to intimidate them into dispersing…hmmm, can’t remember what happened next…everything calmed down, I think, right?

    Edit: Autocorrect betrayed me.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Conservatives

      Liberalism is when you blame conservatives for what you’re both doing.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Should be treated like they are? Okay, so full outrage, comparisons to the Kent State massacre, and the administration facing reprisals and consequences for deploying snipers to intimidate, threaten, and potentially murder students.

    We’re treating them like they’re snipers, Admin, you’re welcome.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We’re so different from those godless immoral Chinese communists, something like Tianenman Square would never happen here.

    Lol.

    Lmao, even.

      • FeeshyFish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Translation: Threats of violence are fine for a government to regularly make as long as no one has died.

        Not authoritarian at all

        • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          But they have these at football games and other major events including political events and so on too? Why is this any different, especially when considering it’s related to the Middle East and considering what happens w/ suicide bombers?

          These spotters are different from the police shootings in the Kent State incident, no?

  • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Disinformation post ahead of election season - big shocker.

    These aren’t snipers, they’re spotters. You can’t even make out what is in front of the dude in all black.

    OPs only response to the closest thing we have to real fact being given was “I don’t buy it”

    Seems legit. Toodles.

    And now you’re deleting my posts lol. What a joke.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just because you can’t read Chinese doesn’t mean it was spam.

        Industry standard tiananamen square copy pasta that gets Chinese propaganda pushers in trouble with Winnie The Pooh. You realize how this looks for you and this instance right?

              • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Look, can we start this over? I don’t like how this played out and I too was getting bent out of shape for what was likely good-intentions.

                I’d understand if you were still upset and needed some time yet, totally fine

                Lemmy is supposed to be better than Reddit culture, and be more civilized, and I feel like this was a fail here. I’d like to try again and maybe we can have some civil discourse about this if you’re up for it

    • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Where do you think the administration got the info that its just spotters from? Cops. The fact that they even called the cops is a red flag.

      What the fuck does this have to do with the election?

          • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Because it’s better than believing an unregulated social media site that’s been proven to pedal disinformation repeatedly??

            A platform owned by the richest man in the world who happens to be the son of South African apartheid?

            A platform for which he removed fact checking on?

            The only picture you have, you can’t even make out what’s in front of them?

            Can I ask why you deleted my comment that had the Tiananmen Square Massacre copy pasta?