• catsup@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    22 days ago

    rofl at this title trying to victimize google for being monopolistic assholes

    • Sestren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 days ago

      How does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.

      • catsup@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        “Must crack open”

        crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it.

        “Epic Judge”

        The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.

        • vrek@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 days ago

          Ok, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.

          • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Welcome to America, where the judges might as well wear racing suits full of sponsors. Actually, that might be an improvement on the status quo.