Then removes the post itself for “misinfo”.

Suffice to say I think that the mod was just salty that I posted something that was not praising Russia, idfk what they were thinking.

Link to OP: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/25545288

What do you think, is me telling a regular that they’re not prescient, banworthy “chauvinism”? Power trippin’ bastard or nah?

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Should we use the acronyms here too? NTA, YTA, ESH, NAH?

    If yes: N[ot] T[he] A[rsehole].

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the thought process of whoever banned you was like, "NATO bad. NATO fights Russia, so Russia good. Russia good, so Russia wins. If you say Russia might not win, you think Russia bad. "

    Because it’s how the cookie crumbles in .ml: always oversimplifying complex matters and conflating predictions (what you did) with prescriptions (what could be called “chauvinism”).

    The fact that it’s a 30d ban is also relevant. Not just because your post is almost 30d old; but because, outside very specific situations, it’s a sign of powertripping.