This has to be the idea of the century

  • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    NT was a fully seperate product from 95 and 98, using a different kernel. 95 -> 98 -> Me was the old kernel, NT -> 2000 -> XP -> Vista -> 7 -> 8 -> 10 -> 11 is the other line. Me was a play on Millenium Edition, so that line was just numbered by year. The NT series names are a bit wonky, though. The reason for skipping 9 involves legacy program support and bad coding practices from ye olde programmers. 7 was kind of an arbitrary number to begin with, though.

    • vrek@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, I understand the whole different kernal thing but that’s the type of thing that the average consumer shouldn’t have to know to follow your program naming scheme.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      7 was the version if you only counted the “best ofs” Windows 3, 95, XP, Vista, 7.