ElCanut@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 hours agoAsking the real questionsjlai.luimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1893arrow-down16
arrow-up1887arrow-down1imageAsking the real questionsjlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 hours agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-squareBatmanAoD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·8 hours agoBut differently spelled names are legally distinct.
minus-squarelseif@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·53 minutes agoi think they mean that pronounciation matters for determing validity, not for the actual record or distinguishing between names
minus-squareBatmanAoD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·33 minutes agoBut that doesn’t really address the original question, does it? You don’t have to pronounce all the letters in a name, so the fact that you can’t pronounce a newline isn’t sufficient to demonstrate that it can’t be part of a name.
But differently spelled names are legally distinct.
i think they mean that pronounciation matters for determing validity, not for the actual record or distinguishing between names
But that doesn’t really address the original question, does it? You don’t have to pronounce all the letters in a name, so the fact that you can’t pronounce a newline isn’t sufficient to demonstrate that it can’t be part of a name.