• Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I find it especially amusing that in my Lemmy feed the post right before this one is a quote from a book by a Nobel laureate talking about the importance of self-marketing, politicking and ladder climbing in academia. You know, all the stuff that isn’t science that plays a part in what Yann LeCun considers to play a vital role in what counts as science.

    • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Although I have no doubt that, like every other field, academia is filled with politics; and publishing process probably helps enforce such politics.

      However, I would argue that modern academic publishing is absolutely necessary to produce “useful” science. In order for people to build upon others’ result, they will need strong guarantee of correctness, which necessitates the review process ; and top conferences can also save researchers a lot of time to find impactful new research, especially new ideas.

      That being said, I am absolutely not suggesting the publishing system is not without its problems; but I kind of agree with LeCun here, publishing is a important part of the process, and it is will probably out-last both Tesla and Elon.