“The truth is that from a legal perspective, these resolutions are not complicated,” Sanders said during a press conference Tuesday, alongside Sens. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; Peter Welch, D-Vt.; and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. “They are cut and dry. The United States government is currently in violation of the law, and every member of the Senate who believes in the rule of law should vote for these resolutions.”

Despite aid groups reporting that Israel has continued to block humanitarian aid into Gaza, the White House overlooked the blown deadline last week, saying that it will continue to provide weapons to Israel. The decision stands in direct violation of existing U.S. law preventing the government from sending weapons to countries that block U.S.-backed humanitarian assistance.

With the Biden administration unwilling to act and legislation targeting pro-Palestinian nonprofits still advancing, pro-Palestinian advocates and their allies in Congress argue that passing the joint resolutions is likely the last real opportunity for Democrats to address the crisis in Gaza before Republicans take control in January.

Despite Democrats’ unwillingness to vote for conditioning military aid to Israel in the past, Araabi hopes that at least some of the lame-duck senators who won’t be returning in January will take this opportunity to cement an anti-genocide record.

  • Random123@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Did you forget that democrats supported the attack on gaza?

    Jfc have some self awareness and realize both sides are doing this bullshit.

      • Random123@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Your point was not eloquently conveyed then.

        Because you literally said, any democrat that doesnt support sanders is supporting trump when this isnt a Trump issue…

        I wonder if youd say they would be supporting trump if Kamala were in office wanting to sell arms to israel.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think they forgot that, my friend. Everyone knows it.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      He didnt forget, he just doesnt care. Most dems dont care at all about browns in other countries. They occassionally pretend to, for whatever reason, but they are well aware that some bad stuff happen to keep the wheels of the empire oiled.

      • Random123@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Youre giving the same vibes as OP youre not any better buddy. Do you notice the similarity? Both of you attack each side and associate each other with bad decisions when the decisions are shared by both parties.

        If anything i hope you are able to see that rather than get a knee jerk response and block people

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          oh no, bad vibes is it. I run the risk of not being “any better”? You seem to think its all about perceived superiority in this trashheap of a party and election outcome that we are all sitting in together.

          Did it maybe occurr to you that I’m giving off the same vibes as OP because I agree with OP?

          Dems could have come out en masse for “uncommitted” in the primary and most of them chose not to. It would have cost them nothing, Biden still would have won but he’d have received a message against genocide sent pretty loudly, but nope, anyone who suggested it was shouted down by their fellow dems. Seems to prove that most of them wont lift a finger for their principles even if its completely free. So that proves what I said about Dems pretending to care about the genocide.

          and so what if I block people? How does that affect you in any way? It doesnt.

          • Random123@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well shit that explains it. To be fair it is all about perceived superiority with people who complain about parties, people who like to generalize people in a group into the same couple of categories.

            If people stopped bitching less about parties and actually complained together on certain issues we would have a less divisive and focused society. Instead all i hear is constant blaming and it does nothing but rile you guys up with nothing to do with that energy.

            Yes i agree certain dems in power are part of the problem but the same goes with the rep. There we got that established. Instead of continuously repeating that same fact in different conversations what are YOU gonna do about it?

            Blocking me only brings me a good chuckle, as for you, blocking everyone you dont agree with only keeps you closed minded and fragile which is not what we want, right?

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              blocking everyone you dont agree with only keeps you closed minded and fragile

              I dont block everyone, I block the dumbest and the worst trolls who derail and degrade the comment flow.