• Tinidril@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I agree, but I also think the Democrats could have run a candidate that did matter. Harris was just another useless establishment clone.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      If they had done that, they would have lost just the same and people would be complaining that they didn’t run someone more mainstream.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Sometimes. Not this time. Harris didn’t come within a thousand miles of running a campaign that would support that.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                That’s why you have real primaries. I’d bet Wallz could have won at the top of the ticket. Any Democrat with a scrap of charisma and an anti-establishment vibe could have done it. It was Harris’s ties to Biden that did her in more than anything else.

                • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Did you watch the VP debate? Walz could never have pulled it off. Nobody could have, short of maybe someone like John Stewart. The people wanted lies, not the truth.

                  • Tinidril@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    16 days ago

                    I think Walz in a Walz campaign and Walz in a Harris campaign are two very different things. Walz in that debate was playing the message discipline game and pulling his punches because of it

          • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            Sometimes you’re going to lose no matter what you do.

            Are you saying Donald Trump was unbeatable in 2024? Nothing Dems did would’ve mattered?

              • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                Probably.

                I always believe that a candidate of the genuine left, pushing things most people want and need — universal health care, breaking up giant corporations, enthusiastic tax increases for billionaires, complete medical and student debt forgiveness, patching the pathetic safety net that barely exists for the unemployed, the sick, the disabled, etc— would win by two touchdowns. But I don’t know who that candidate would’ve been in 2024, and the question is moot because Democrats would never nominate a leftist.

                • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  As great as that candidate would be, they wouldn’t accomplish any of that. We need to move the house and senate to the left before any president like that would actually make a difference.