- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
In particular:
“On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say … get some help and take an honest look at yourself,” Penelope Hegseth wrote, stating that she still loved him.
Trump announced he intends to nominate Pete Hesgeth to be Secretary of Defense.
This is part of a broader pattern, including:
You must log in or register to comment.
When your own mother condemns your actions towards multiple women over the years, you know you have really fucked up.
It’s a feature not a bug of Trump appointees.
Does this mean she accused him repeatedly over the years, or that he mistreated women for years, for which she accused him?
The latter. Per the article:
“On behalf of all the women (and I know it’s many) you have abused in some way, I say … get some help and take an honest look at yourself,” Penelope Hegseth wrote, stating that she still loved him.
Nice sleuthing. I have so many questions about what else might be written in the article, I will start writing out a long comment.
Did the parent comment make some kind of evidence based claim? What did it say?
The parent commenter asked a question that was literally answered by the article. They just read the headline without reading the article.
That’s normal. On reddit, only about 2 or 3 percent click through to the article. Given the user interface similarity, I’d expect the same here
Sorry, I was making a joke, similar to the point of PC, as if I couldn’t be bothered to read the comment they were replying to.
Aah I seem to have fallen prey to Poe’s Law.
This isn’t the automatic disqualifier it would be if he was a Democrat.
Prediction: trump will fire this cunt for stealing his thunder.
