• Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        Indeed.

        Note that I’m not claiming anything, just pointing out the traditional philosophical parameters of what-is-or-isn’t-‘god’.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      It is impossible for a being to be omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent given the amount of suffering in the world. They can only be two of the three at most:

      Omnipotent + omniscient = Knows about evil, can stop it, but chooses not to.

      Omnipotent + benevolent = Can do something about evil and wants to stop it, is too oblivious to on a large scale.

      Omniscient + benevolent = Knows about evil and wants to stop it, is powerless to do anything significant about it.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Yeah, that’s the way most people see it.

        As it happens, people don’t generally talk about it very much. For some reason.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          If they’re believers it’s because god is “good” no matter what he does or allows to happen.