The first sentence on the Wikipedia page for it calls it “a disputed medical condition.” Even the CIA itself has admitted that cases are not caused by “a sustained global campaign by a hostile power.” The State Department similarly released a report that it was highly unlikely the symptoms were caused by any sort of directed energy weapon. In fact, seven different US intelligence agencies released a consensus statement saying, “available intelligence consistently points against the involvement of US adversaries in causing the reported incidents.”

But the clowns on .world don’t care about things like truth or evidence, or even direct statements from the people who’s boots they have in their mouths. If it makes an enemy of the US look bad, then it is absolute truth, and anything short of complete faith and loyalty must be purged from conversation.

Rare video clip of a .world mod

Offending post

  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Honestly, the mod probably didn’t get past the first sentence. That was an extremely hard to read rant with a lot of red flags. Can’t say I blame them.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      Of course there were red flags, I’m a communist.

      Red flags for what exactly? That I’m not a part of their tribe? Because I say that pretty openly and consistently. Last I checked that’s not against the rules.

      And what exactly about my first sentence would justify my comment’s removal? Skepticism of the government?

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I mean, ‘first sentence’ was a bit of hyperbole. But you get my gist. I’m not saying you were wrong or broke any rules, I’m just explaining why this happened.