• sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Was it policy, or taking a stance on “religious symbols”? I feel it’s more the latter, but I can’t remember much about that election.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      In 2011 Quebec voted almost unanimously for the NDP, convinced for once that they were on the same page as the ROC. It had nothing to do with religion, it was all about policy. Somehow after that the NDP thought it would be a good idea to replace Layton with a Liberal from Quebec that no one liked and move the party to the right.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        After the 2015 election, Mulcair said:

        “[The niqab] hurt us terribly. It was measured. I can share with you that the polling we did showed we dropped over 20 points in 48 hours here in Quebec because of the strong stand I took on the niqab,”

        As the rest of the mea culpa states, the NDP made lots of mistakes. The niqab footgun was the easiest to see because of the immediate and angy reaction, but the others clearly hurt as well.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Mulcair can say that if he wants, but I guarantee you the move to the economic right while insisting on idopol is what sank them. At the exact same time the most popular politician in Quebec was Amir Khadir, an Iranian, running for Quebec Solidaire.