Political flier with a photo of Trump on the right side and various warning symbols throughout the text. There is a watermark on the flier that appears to be an eagle similar to other US symbols containing eagles. The text reads: VOTER ALERT. We see you haven't voted yet. Your voting record is public... Your neighbors are watching you and will know if you miss this critical runoff election. We will notify President Trump if you don't vote. You can't afford to have that on your record. Our Republican values are at stake in this election. 1) Border Security, 2) Property Taxes, and 3) Parental Empowerment. VOTE EARLY before the deadline this Friday, May 24th at 7:00pm or VOTE ON ELECTION DAY Tuesday, May 28th. NOTICE: We will contact you after the election to make sure you voted!

Note: some slight edits have been made in the image description to aid in readability by screen readers. Specifically, the values listed have been enumerated for clarity and the specific symbols used as warning symbols have not been explicitly described. Additionally, some of the text formatting has not been carried over in this description. For example, the title (VOTER ALERT) is in large white text over a red banner at the top of the flier. It is my hope that leaving these particular descriptions out will aid in understanding the flier itself; however, should anyone prefer a description of these formatting choices I will be glad to attempt it.

  • jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the sort of stuff I figured would happen with how public voting data is in the US (everyone can know what party you’re registered with, which elections you voted in, and in some cases your actual address?).

    It’s just crazy how there’s no privacy.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      And, what money you’ve contributed and to who. Out of curiosity I looked up some people I knew and learned what were the details of their contributions.

      I definitely think the transparency is a good thing but it feels weird that everyone can know that Frank gave $20.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Donations should be public, although that transparency is severely undermined by dark money PACs.