• Downcount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s STILL not good, as you stated. Not good in any way. Do you know, what it does mean, if other countries don’t take the people arriving at the south coasts of Europe?

              • Downcount@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah. Who cares about dying people, we could save.

                What an utterly egoistic and unhuman point of view.

                I bet my ass you would be under the first waves of people to flee / migrate if there would be major crisis in your land with no forseable end for the next 20 years.

                • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We can’t save them, we have our own problems and if its not politically possible, than that’s it. Otherwise we risk far right gaining more and more voters.

                  And no. Id rather bite the dust than leave my house. Also, if everyone runs away there is of course no future.

                  • Downcount@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    We can not only save them (that’s what asylum stands for) we also should not actually kill them by sending them back.

                    Also you shouldn’t be afraid of the far right. You actually have much in common.