A court ruling on Friday put an involuntary manslaughter case against Alec Baldwin on track for trial in early July as a judge denied a request to dismiss the case on complaints that key evidence was damaged by the FBI during forensic testing.

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer sided with prosecutors in rejecting a motion to dismiss the case.

Defense attorneys had argued that the gun in the fatal shooting was heavily damaged during FBI forensic testing before it could be examined for possible modifications or problems that might exonerate the actor-producer.

The ruling removes one of the last hurdles before prosecutors can bring the case to trial with jury selection scheduled for July 9 in Santa Fe.

  • 555@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well, that firearm shouldn’t be capable of firing live rounds. It’s a movie prop. There should never be a question if it’s dangerous, because the answer will always be “no”

    • RedC@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sure that should always be the case. But this time it wasn’t. And because of his actions someone died. As an actor and a producer he should never have even had a chance of firing a live round while they weren’t filming, but he did. If the round never hit anybody this would be an entirely different case, unfortunately that’s not how it went down.

      • 555@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        As a producer, a fine. As an actor, nothing.

        The quartermaster should get manslaughter and a host of other negligence charges.