Points out where working with me give no security guarantees, that they accept when agreeing to allow me to hack them, either in person, writing, or electronic communications, along with allowing the terms to change at any time, for any reason, without notice.

According to a lot of people? No.

I mean, it is just sponge cake, from what I have looked at people generally didn’t just eat them this plain. They added sesame seeds/oil, dip them into tea, add various types of creams, honey, etc.

maybe crab cakes?

looks good

From the thumb nail it looked like someone holing a tiny little cupcake

If by stunt you mean, “discusses how the character has been set-up as the natural replacement with games media interviewer”… then sure, stunt.

Heh, It wasn’t world, I bailed there when I saw they banned others for telling people to jury nullify luigi’s case. It was on an account I mostly use for NSFW content, which was not the account I expected to get a ban for political speech.

Cool, I know being a mod sucks, used to do it when I was younger. Just, have had my comments that corpos, having spent decades, and billions, destroying any civil means of change, will mean they will suffer violence for it, get me banned on an instance.

I know from experience some mods don’t see the difference. Which is why I asked.

Would discussion of the break down of the efficacy of civil venues for change, leading to this kind of violence, as an outcome of their own actions, be acceptable?

Jigs up boys! Fly! Fly!

Coo, coo

but then we wouldn’t be defeating the whining about water battleships and the horizon

I think you misinterpreted the intent of my comment. I was saying that everyone being some form of fag is a 4chanism, and wondered if the person replied to was familiar with 4chan, because the reason for the term is basically something you can’t have gone on 4chan and not seen.

Just make a hovering AWACS that can hold U2 elevation. Then the gunship could hit targets across the pacific.

Everyone on 4chan is some xfag

Honest question, are you familiar with 4chan at all?

Even if temple prostitutes were completely voluntary, it still wouldn’t solve these underlying issues. When discussing rape with rapists, it isn’t about sex, it is about raping someone. Sex isn’t going to sate the urge to commit the act of rape. Are there people out there that may not have raped someone if they had access to sex? Sure, but those are edge cases. Also I think OP is misidentifying the lashing out of horny men, like incels, to be about sex alone. Sure, it may put a bandaid on the situation, for them, for a bit. However, the underlying issue is that they are lonely, have no intimate companionship, and have to no access to that form of relationship. Getting their dicks wet might cool them off a bit, but there will still be these communities of angry, dejected, men who do not have that type of relationship.

Until the USSC decides that since congress can hold securities in investments they legislate the industry for, then appointees should be able to do the same.

We shall see, I guess

we shall see, he has been pledging to, essentially, make police legally invincible. He says a lot of things though, however, based on his own personality, this seems like something he would push for.

This, also, just because he may have had good coverage to do the surgery, stuff like that can have lifelong consequences that can need routine, expensive, medical care, for years, if not the rest of your life. Even if they are getting care, their insurance, even “good” insurance, could have denied much better therapy, for the cheaper route, which will have a major negative impact.

It is too early to be making up our minds about this arrest, this guy, etc. However, just because your parents have money, doesn’t mean you can escape the evils of the private healthcare system.