“dürfte”
Wäre ja irgendwie gut wenn “ein Überblick” gesicherte Fakten hätte.
Absurd.
It’s also kind of crazy that even in the state Russia is in, the administration still has to look out for how they are perceived. Despite its oppression and control.
The remainder gets imported
32,1+26,6+14,8+7+5,1+1,4+1,1 = 88,1
So 11,9 % gets/got imported?
According to Swierk et al., nine of those 10 inks did not meet EU regulations; five simply failed to list all the components, but four contained prohibited ingredients.
It could explain why Norway is ahead of other countries. With an abundance of electricity, I assume it was also easier to fund and promote infrastructure and other incentives.
I don’t know how electricity compares concretely to fuel between filling the tank and acquisition cost.
Norway has a lot of and cheap hydro-produced electricity power. They’re in a good precondition for it. It’s not that surprising because of that.
Text-Image-Text reads:
GermanForeignOffice (@GermanyDiplo)
Like it or not: Germany’s energy system is fully operational, with more than 50% renewables. And we are shutting down - not building - coal & nuclear plants. Coal will be off the grid by 2038 at the latest.
PS: We also don’t eat cats and dogs.
#Debate2024
Lootboxes influence how the game plays. Inclusive characters is [an issue of] perception, not gameplay.
Opposing inclusion [of other kinds of people] is different from opposing mechanics.
Why are they getting away with it?
Established culture, critical mass, and platform ownership.
Steam is an online platform owned by Valve. They have ToS and a Code of Conduct. Those are published, announced baselines you can compare and report against.
Churches are not all the same, and are generally not on a platform with authority you report them to.
You’re asking for public shaming. Which can and does [sometimes] happen as bad press, protests, and prosecutions. But generally, it’s more difficult and higher risk in the real-life public, and less likely to succeed given their established nature.