↙️↙️↙️

Alcohol works with ink. I wouldn’t even want to try milk.

Top of my wish list is a death note.

That’s my favorite lore!

> Obviously didn’t understand the statement

> Insults the other person’s intelligence

> lemmy.ml

Not surprised.

I think it’d be simultaneously easier, more productive, and more fulfilling to just take the L.

🤷‍♂️ I only use local generators at this point,so I don’t care.

I don’t understand how those two things are distinct.

🎼It’s gonna be Blue~~~ Ski~~e~s for yo_u~ and I~ 🎶

Oh you’re published? It’s cute you think that means anything in this context.

Russia is known to pay flesh-and-blood human beings to act as agents in information campaigns. The fact that you don’t know that and just assumed I was talking about chat bots for no apparent reason tells me everything I need to know. It’s why I was mocking you; your statement just had nothing to do with what was being spoken of, and you’re either dishonest or too oblivious and self-absorbed to realize that.

For the record, there are full grown adults who were born after my first research project with publishable results.

“I am very smrt”

Oh look, an obvious lie to deflect after being disingenuous. What a fucking surprise.

No one’s denying genocide. Helping a fascist come to power is fascist.

Sure, that’s fair, but I’m all for blaming people who argued against trying to do even the bare minimum to avert it.

You helped Trump win, and I hope the results of the election personally hurt you in a very deep way.

I suddenly stopped seeing a bunch of posters I had tagged as a “Russian Asset”. I’m sure it’s because I blocked some of them, but the fact that I don’t have any false positives left to plague me tells me a lot.

Yeah “it” because fascist aren’t people. They’re dangerous destructive things that shouldn’t be tolerated.

Oh wow, it’s a mind reader.

Removed by mod

This comment was deleted, but the fact that the user “fuckisrael” is the one who made it is deeply funny to me. Guess that one wasn’t a Russian spy after all. I don’t think they’d be active at this point otherwise.

You understand that arguments about the legitimacy of law is an argument about whether a law should exist rather than if a law does exist, right?

There’s a difference between saying that someone’s “in the right” (which they’re absolutely not) and saying someone is legally capable of doing what they want. (which is debatable)