• 19 Posts
  • 200 Comments
Joined 14 days ago
cake
Cake day: December 4th, 2024

help-circle











  • Gambling, not gaming. Games are things you play for enjoyment, not things that you pour money into with the (almost always disappointed) hope that more money will come back to you.

    Examples of games:

    • Fallout New Vegas
    • Settlers of Catan
    • Twister
    • Truth or Dare

    NOT games:

    • Roulette

    • Blackjack

    • Slot machines (whether physical or virtual)

    • Predatory capitalism

    Hybrids and edge cases:

    • Any game with loot boxes and similar bullshit

    • Poker, though it’s more akin to sports gambling than enjoyment with gambling.

    • online dating






  • Such as insisting on doing a bunch of reprehensible things that your base hates while you’re running for public office?

    Yes, exactly! That is a counterproductive action. And I levy my criticisms regarding that action to the actors themselves, in my direct communication to them.

    You have a direct line of communication with the president and vice president of the United States? That’s impressive, but I don’t. Hence the need to express my critiques to peers in stead.

    Two things can be true: it is in the best interest of the DNC to more effectively court their base, and it is in the best interest of leftists for the lesser evil of the duopoly to win until we can break the duopoly.

    Yes, but I have at no point argued that the lesser evil shouldn’t win.

    That’s what you keep refusing to understand: I want them to change their actions both because the actions are themselves atrocious AND because I wanted them to win and those actions were causing them to lose.

    That’s why my correspondence with my representatives is focused entirely on their failings

    First of all, I still don’t have a direct line of communications to the white house. Second of all, I guarantee that, if I had, my complaints and warnings would not be heeded. Like those you pretend to have made were.

    and my correspondence with other voters is focused entirely on their virtues.

    Well that’s just obsequious serf bullshit. Pretending in public that “your team” is always perfect and can do no wrong doesn’t convince anyone. It just makes you a bootlicker whose perspective only fellow bootlickers will relate to.

    It’s amazing how you keep holding the meaningful actions of the most powerful people in the most powerful country in the world to a much lower standard of responsibility than me, a regular poor person, expressing a reasonable opinion.

    I hold them responsible for their actions,

    No you fucking don’t! You claim that you have a private line where you get to discuss all your concerns with the White House, but we both know that that’s bullshit.

    You may leave a message for your congressperson and/or senator to ignore, but that’s it. That’s the extent of your options for expressing dissent ay we both know that won’t stop the support for genocide any more than me voicing my displeasure in a public forum. If anything, it’s LESS effective, as public dissent is much harder to ignore.

    and I hold you responsible for yours

    My actions of checks notes making my opinion on committing the most heinous crimes against humanity and (correctly, it unfortunately turned out) warning that continuing to ignore the people could cost the election and lead to the fascists taking over

    Ooh, such transgression! Ever heard of the first amendment to the US constitution? It has a few sentences specifically about this kind of thing.

    It’s not that my standard for them is lower, my standard for them is irrelevant to the actions of others.

    That would normally make sense, but in the specific case of arguing that it’s wrong to ever criticize the Biden administration in public, that’s absolute counterfactual nonsense.

    Be better and demand better from the people supposed to represent you, please.



  • There’s a time and a place for criticism, a close race between bad and worse is not that time,

    The only reason why the two overlapped at all was because the ones aiding and abetting genocide have been refusing to even acknowledge any wrongdoing for over a year!

    A blindingly obvious example of this “not listening to their base” problem I mentioned.

    online leftist spaces are not that place

    Where else would you suggest?

    Far right places like Truth social where everyone will agree for the wrong reasons, wrongly thinking that it’s about making sure that Trump wins?

    “Centrist” places where everyone will automatically disagree, wrongly thinking that it’s about making sure that Trump wins?

    Just admit that there’s no time and no place where you would actually take constructive criticism from the left seriously and pretending that there is is a pretense for making people sit down and shut up.

    Every leftist voter who chooses to abstain contributes to the fascists’ margin.

    Again with the classics bootlicker role reversal.

    It’s the job of politicians to earn the confidence and thus the votes of the people.

    It’s NOT the job of the people to meekly go along with politicians with ethically and morally compromised politicians with bad ideas unquestioningly, even IF they’re still the least bad option.

    The politicians failed the people, not the other way around.

    The difference is that you don’t control the DNC’s strategy, you do control your actions.

    The irony of telling the that I’m only allowed to voice dissent at specific times and places where it would be ignored and then saying I’m in control 🤦

    Newsflash: the people is SUPPOSED to control the DNC’s strategy! They’re public servants paid through public means to enact the will of the people FFS! That’s literally what they’re there for!