1·
9 minutes agostop usibg [sic] ur brain and thinking for yourself
You don’t need to tell them to do that, they clearly already did before commenting. But then, so did you.
(she/her)
- a very silly girlie in her toxic femininity era (but like, in a I-support-women’s-wrongs kinda way)
- Butlerian jihadist (machines should not think!!;! BAD!!) (techbros plz face the wall 🥺)
- I do a little fedposting, as a treat
- anarchist (I need to believe a better world is possible)
- 0 Posts
- 125 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 15th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Holy shit you have absolutely no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, so please shut the fuck up about your uninformed personal opinions.
Puberty blockers only delay the onset of puberty until you stop taking them, at which point development resumes normally with far less downsides than the risk of developing undesired sex characteristics. So no, this is not “the same choice no matter if we ban or allow this.” The same choice would be starting actual sex hormones; puberty blockers are the middle ground here.
Banning puberty blockers is politically motivated actors putting their politics above people’s bodily autonomy and medical professionals’ ability to make medically informed decisions.
You’re flat out wrong that allowing doctors to prescribe puberty blockers would cause risk of greater suffering in such a way as to make it abundantly clear that you don’t know what those meds actually do.
You are a fucking moron. Username checks out.
0·5 hours agoHow is this a LAMF? Didn’t Uncommitted say that as much as the Democrats suck, people should still vote for them over Trump?
3·8 hours agoSure, but Biden/Harris hemmorrhaged about 15,000,000 voters between 2020 and 2024 due to lacking messaging that appealed to the electorate. Turns out that “this guy is a fascist but also we want to do bipartisanship with his party” doesn’t really appeal to people.
1·18 hours agoAgency when?
Tbh I’m just glad I’m not some sort of heterosexual
“radical feminism” refers to a specific ideology born of the second wave, not just any feminism that is radical.
Ah yes, decades of hardship and adversity has led to the systemic marginalisation in society of… checks notes… white men.
Mate how old are you? This is some 14-year-old-who-browses-gamersriseup tier shit. You made me chuckle, I’ll grant you that, but damn it’s pathetic.
16·2 days agoYeah we’re proper fucked tbh
In that case yeah, I guess it is a vehicle.
Sure, but quite often in EMUs the cars come in sets that can’t operate disconnected from each other, so I’d argue that they still comprise a single vehicle.
I’d argue that the ISS, due to lacking means of propulsion (unless you count explosive decompression) is not a vehicle.
Well shit, these crackers must be really brittle.
“World’s largest EV”
Blatantly untrue. Larger EVs have been in use for more than a century at this point in the form of EMU trains.
What protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.
That’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.
623·3 days agoIt’s all shits and giggles until anon ends up in a ‘man vs bear spray’ scenario
Assuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?
No it should not be the decision of the parents, it should be the decision of the patient and their doctors.