I’m not sure what you’re implying with this. But how did you dig this up anyway?
I’m not sure what you’re implying with this. But how did you dig this up anyway?
If you think about it, Trump fits even better. Also wears red (figuratively) and is chonky, but he’s actually yellow/orange, unlike Xi.
Skill issue. Try the following:
Hope this helps. Git gud.
Mega Drive is clearly better because that’s the one I had as a child.
I have to dig deep into my brain, but is this Oreimo? I remember practically nothing, but that’s the neuron that fired.
I know you’re joking and referencing Linus, but you can consider it piracy and still be ok with doing it.
It’s happening on the 9th of 18th month, we’ve still got some time.
This is Lemmy, you scroll for 5 mins and you’ve seen all the worthy posts for the day.
And it’s a benefit in my book.
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
“Normal” is a fluid term. It changes based on what the majority thinks. At some point slavery was normal and a part of life. But we as a society decided that we should move away from oppressive systems that marginalize and discriminate.
So, while it’s true that in many cultures “entrenched gender roles” are considered normal, that doesn’t mean certain people aren’t suffering from it. In fact, it doesn’t require much debate to acknowledge that in a system where there’s a power imbalance (in other words, inequality), there will inevitably be an oppressed group, and therefore, suffering.
As long as you consider “reducing the amount of suffering” an “absolute good/right”, then abolishing entrenched gender roles is an absolute good. Promoting gender equality doesn’t mean that women are prohibited from going to the kitchen and men must be stay-at-home dads. It simply ensures that these roles are a matter of personal choice rather than societal imposition.
Moreover, gender equality is not solely a liberal value; it has been promoted in various ideologies, including socialist and communist systems. While the practical implementation has varied, these systems have often supported the idea of gender equality alongside broader social reforms.
Capitalism may not be the problem, but “country being ruled by capitalism” definitely is.
“Survivors will be shoot again”.
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
I think their point is that people don’t actually buy Apple products for privacy and therefore it’s not “the main selling point”.
I mean, if you log in to Facebook at all, whatever MacOS collects is a drop in a bucket in comparison.
I didn’t say it’s perfect, but it’s not terrible. And I think that page is mostly about Apple services, like iCloud and stuff, not MacOS specifically. It’s not necessary to use the services.
Ubuntu has Snap and ads and stuff, but I thought Manjaro was considered good. What’s wrong with it? It’s supposed to be Arch based.
Privacy and data collection-wise MacOS is fine. It’s their main selling point. Doesn’t even force updates on you. I know it’s a low bar, but damn Windows bar is at the floor at this point.
Oh you mean that the number 256 overflows into 0 in 8-bit range. My joke was leaning more into the idea that when you use all 256 possible bit combinations (
1111 1111
), it can represent -1 in signed integer formats. Even though 255 is the highest number you can directly represent, there are still 256 total combinations, including zero, so IMO, the joke works.