Personally, it’s not Google’s place to dictate how an app verification ecosystem works. If a company has developed an app, they need to be the ones to make sure it’s secure in the first place, not trusting a monopolist tech company that has almost all control with how someone uses their phone.

Google has rules yes, but Android is open-source and should be open with a free & open market for apps. After all, we paid for the device.

You’ve always been able to side load apps you are correct.

However, this is not what Google wants. Over the years, Google has started to enforce more restrictions on third-party applications. They’ve been slowly making these options more difficult to find in the settings of certain OEMs. Just because they give you the freedom, doesn’t always mean they care.

But yes you are correct that Apples monopoly on their app store is way worse. But Google would absolutely remove more user choice settings if certain things like the GPL didn’t stand in the way of the Android OS.

If Android had never been open-sourced, they would absolutely not have any options for third party installations mark my words.

They only thing standing in their way is Linux and the GPL.

Google is just as malicious as Apple. They are just better at hiding it.

Here’s a harsh truth and a reality some tech users need to wake up to.

Google has never cared about open-source. They have never cared about user-choice/user freedom. They could easily tomorrow make Android closed-source and that would be the end of Android. It has always been about control. Apple got that authoritarian idea correct long ago by locking down the entire OS.

Google is allowing open-source modding only because there’s a large community out there that cares and wants it to thrive. And since it runs on Linux, it would make Google look VERY bad if they removed bootloader unlocking, open source, removed features that causes issues for custom roms.

Google doesn’t care you YOU. If they really cared, they wouldn’t be slowly removing features or adding anti-user features that in the long run, don’t benefit anyone but them.

I’m glad the government declared them a convicted monopoly. I’m still ashamed it took them this long to finally go through with it.

What an insane world we live in.

I sent the FTC a letter asking them to look into the practices of bootloader locking. They did they they would consider looking into it

Don’t feel bad for blocking their ads. The internet was never meant to have that much advertising in the first place. If websites can’t afford to keep their site up then they probably don’t need to be running it in the first place.

If your site has to host spammy bloated malicious third party advertising then I think there’s a bigger issue at stake. Users shouldn’t have to sacrifice their privacy and security to view content. Also greed isn’t the same as “we need ads to keep our site running” when clearly they are making enough but want more.

It’s honestly insane how tech illiterate people can’t grasp this privacy concept and just learn to use a damn ad blocker. I don’t mind justification but at some point you have to be the bad guy and fight back against cooperate greed.

Stay strong. Firefox+uBlock origin is the goat!

I was talking to a friend the other about about this. He said he loves the Android OS. He said imagining putting Linux on it and I couldn’t help but laugh. His eyes widened when I told him what Android really was