Snaps themselves are a GPLd format
Snaps themselves are a GPLd format
Not only do the band know about this practice they will have absolutely approved its use. So direct some of your scorn to Oasis and not just Ticketmaster.
You were saying the input size doesn’t matter because you only store the hash which is always the same size. What I’m saying is that the input size really does matter.
You absolutely should set upper limits on all input fields because it will be abused if you don’t. Systems should validate their inputs, passwords included
deleted by creator
You can make a client hash it, but if you don’t reject large inputs to your API a client can send enough data to DOS you anyway.
The resulting hash will always be the same size, but you don’t want to have an unlimited upper bound otherwise I’m using a 25GB blueray rip as my password and your service is going to have to calculate the hash of that whenever I login.
Sensible upper bounds are a must to provide a reliable service not open to DDOS exploits.
Not necessarily. Presumably the change password form requires entering the old and new password at the same time. Then they can compare the two as plain text and hash the old password to make sure it matches, then if so, hash the new password and overwrite it. Passwords stored hashed, comparison only during the change process. A theme on this is checking password complexity rules during the login process and advising to update to something more secure. It’s possible because you’re sending the password as plain text (hopefully over a secure connection), so it can be analysed before computing the hash. This even works if the hash is salt and peppered.
Hidden and Dangerous
The original was fantastic and v2 built on that. Fantastic 3rd person WW2 tactical shooter. Haven’t seen anything like it in over 20 years since.
But everything people call social media does.
The difference is there’s no algorithm abusing you on forums. They are pure.
Clarkson is literally doing more to help farming in Britain than anyone else
The unencrypted data should only be in memory when needed (copied to clipboard, shown on screen etc). After use the objects handling sensitive should overwrite themselves.
A string falling out of scope in C++, or an object being left to the garbage collector is still readable and not overwritten by default. It’s a very easy problem to solve in C++, either through custom allocators or destructors. But it makes a bigger difference when objects having short lifetimes
Use a better search engine.
Those of you who “can’t live without google”, need to get a grip.
“Leaked”.
All leaks are deliberately orchestrated to fan the hype train.
Attackers need to access the system kernel to exploit the Sinkclose vulnerability, so the system would have to already be compromised. The hack itself is a sophisticated vector that is usually only used by state-sponsored hackers, so most casual users should take that into account.
So it’s a vulnerability that requires you to.already have been compromised. Hardly seems like news.
I can understand AMD only patching server chips that by definition will be under greater threat. On the other hand it’s probably not worth the bad publicity not to fix more.
I moved from an FX8350 to a R5 5600G a few years ago, having run it for about 9 years. Initially I didn’t think I’d notice much difference, but frankly it’s an entirely different ballgame.
Too rich for you?
The CD part is just one component. Swap in a Wiim instead of the CD player for an excellent streaming setup. It also functions as the amp and speakers for the TV.
For something 20 years in the making it’s not bad and I bet better systems can be had for less. Certainly my first system cost almost nothing but still sounded fantastic. My recently departed second setup cost £165 all in and in many ways was just as good as my main system.
The point is not my exact setup, but that it is any kind of a hifi at all.
My hifi is: Audiolab 6000A integrated amp Second hand NAD C541i CD player Wharfedale Pacific Evo 40 floor standers I’ve had 20 years
Connected to my PC I have a studio monitor setup, but that’s mostly as I run my guitar though it. Prior to that I had a second hand NAD C320 amp and Wharfedale 9.1 bookshelf speakers. All bought for about £165 and sounded fantastic.
I feel sorry for you.
It’s nothing to do with static assignment of a prefix from my ISP, I have that. It’s to do with static assignment of IP addresses within my own house! Use DHCP and android will not use it; use SLAAC and I have no control over IP addresses and therefore cannot set up sensible firewall rules per device.