Pretty sure absolute criminal immunity for the president would be as well.

People didn’t know Biden dropped out of the race until they were looking at the ballot. There is no end to the ignorance.

How do you do that? Unless they’re your kid, you don’t usually have that kind of control over another person.

Now do the research on the alien enemies act and how it’s already been used.

That amendment really meant consecutive terms. So Trump being president again is fine.

That’s just as ridiculous of an argument as the president being criminally immune.

When the branch that has the final say on what the Constitution means is on board, you don’t have to actually amend it.

I mean anything he does deemed unconstitutional can be challenged by any appeals court judge that can strike it down.

And then appeal it to the SCOTUS who literally gave him criminal immunity. With Congress and SCOTUS, it doesn’t matter what the Constitution actually says. Just what they can twist it with paper thin reasoning to mean.

So who’s stopping him?

I’m so sad we voted against it. Legalizing magic mushrooms had more support than making tipped minimum wage the same as normal minimum wage.

That’s pretty much always what the polls say for the presidential election. I don’t know why people expect pollsters to have crystal balls. The election is mostly decided on who is going to actually go vote, and a lot of people don’t know the answer to that until election day.

I think it might be easier just to do the division.

Marketing isn’t a fan yet. Give it a year, and then we can sell it as efficency.

I don’t think that’s an example. People housing others in their own homes isn’t an example of the perfect solution to homelessness. I don’t know if we have a name for that fallacy but it’s kind of a “put your money where your mouth is” fallacy. If you aren’t willing to give up a lot for the solution, you must not really believe it is a problem/solution.

People being against the ACA because it isn’t single payer health care is an example of the perfect solution fallacy. Or people being against a $15 minimum wage because it really should be $25 now.

So you acknowledge the people who get elected aren’t who you’d want to be policing your speech. Who then in practice?

No, the point was Stein has 0 chance of getting electors because they’re all winner-take-all contests.

Uh, pronouns are just words. They don’t have some innate quality that means they had to exist when the entities those pronouns describe began. He/Him is likely about as old as he/him.

But her age has very little to do with that. Her being closer in age to Biden than AOC is totally irrelevant.

They aren’t proportional. They’re winner take all but at the district level as opposed to the state level.

It really wouldn’t be. Trump would be clearly winning if she did that.

So keep your kids and the pedophiles safe; don’t send your kids to church.

That last line tips into “has to be sarcasm” territory. I don’t think anyone believes America doesn’t meddle.

By 4 years. Harris is pretty in between AOC and Biden age wise. There are members of the squad who are in their late 40s/early 50s. And Bernie is older than Biden.