My immediate reaction before opening the link: “No.”

Yet I somehow got 96.6% twice.

Visually, I certainly wouldn’t call them 3.4% away from perfect. I’m guessing there’s some allowance for imperfection even at 100%.

I assume it was just named after r/politics - like most of the other communities here during the migration.

Looks like it instantly became basically charcoal.

RIP

I haven’t opened the link yet, but I assume OP means Signal to noise ratio. (Specifically the ‘Other uses’ section if it didn’t jump there)

Doesn’t make them wrong.

Even Nate Silver just turned off his model tonight because it was still showing Harris ahead when she very obviously wasn’t.

What is this, a magnification for ants?

I’m surprised it’s not by Eiffel.

I assume a novelization.

Very nice. Apparently the donation model is working for them. I’m going to support them myself after giving it a bit more time, but I’m already impressed.

Yup. Kids are jumpy alright. I expect to see a lot more of them this evening.

The title of the crosspost (and mentioned in the description here) is the equation y=-x² which has a graph that starts at lower left, goes up to 0, then down to lower right.

This gives the intended reading order.

Hey Jude

I would guess a doubling period of roughly every 12-24 months. Actually probably much shorter since that would be same number of chips/year.

It’s not. Note the kid pushing the cup, not using a handle to pull it as would be the case if it were reversed.

(I say as though physics mattered here.)

Edit: Also smoke rising from the pan.

So, what was the solution?

How ionic.

And dress blue!

Definitely not. That count is still zero, and very firmly so.

The store wasn’t even open while he was there.

At least we weren’t first in the nation this time.