That sounds like they were offering the status quo. I.e nothing as nothing would change.

I am dissatisfied with that deal.

Sorry dems, but you only get nothing for nothing.

If I owe them a vote, they owe me some policies.

I’d wait to hear what they offer me that I’m concerned with that they couldn’t have done already. They demonstrated they didn’t want my vote.

Let me rephrase that a way you can understand.

If things were as dire as they wanted us to believe, why were they ignoring us and brining on Liz and dick Cheney?

Why did they ignore us whenever we asked for something? Because they believed they had our vote no matter what.

I don’t want to sign off on another genocide.

That’s because the nazis are cops

I kind of advocate sending them to heaven sooner tbh

Apparently we didn’t kill enough

Dems said to the left. “We offer you nothing and you owe us everything”.

Why are they surprised their entitled demand failed?

That’s only the supposition that people know Harris would be better than Trump. There’s a lot of lies around the economy and who’s better for it.

Same old boring story. You should blame the fascists for their fascism, not leftists.

What you may not be able to understand is that Trump stopped all the “moderate republicans” from leaving him and the dems failed to win them.

The dems ran their campaign on winning moderate republicans. It failed. As it was always going to fail.

The one thing Trump has done right to win was appeal to the people who might listen.

Is amazing you could have to learn the dance lesson over and over again.

Don’t you mean Trump? The literal billionaire who represents the richest man in the world? Weird

I think you missed that they know that they’re Nazis and are proud of it.

Don’t blame people for wanting to hide from the nazis

You don’t blame the fascism on the literal fascists?

Interesting

Really think it was the the leader not offering enough.

Funny how you never blame moderate republicans who refused to switch their vote.

Maybe you should appeal to someone else next time?

Even if that were true, the Dems lost because of their strategy which was based on not giving anything to the left.

It didn’t work for Hilary, what in the hell made you think it’d work for Harris?

I have yet to meet a Trump supporter who is a real person. I’m convinced they’re brain worms ina meat suit

More like sophisticated terrorist attack tools used

Most serious injury/death happens at higher speeds. Lower speeds, increased safety.

No, safety had more to it than less deaths. If we have less deaths but many many more crippling injuries, that’s not better.

They also happen due to distracted drivers, which is not a problem for computers.

Congested and slow traffic seems to confuse self driving the most tbh.

They absolutely do not.

76% of commuters drive alone

Commuters don’t take cabs. We’re talking about cabs.

How do you figure that?

Most accidents occur at low speeds. More traffic, lower speeds.

Don’t know how you figure any of that either. It has an enormous amount of storage. And this could theoretically be not just a taxi but a replacement for your car altogether.

Most people don’t travel alone but in groups of 3 or more.

It’s supposed to make transport safe and more accessible

It’s going to do neither of these things either. Claims that it would are kind of insane. More traffic means more time at risk and more cost when it comes to cabs.

It only has 2 seats because cars are only occupied by more than 2 people like 10% of the time

Butt one of the biggest use for cars is going to the airport with luggage and/or going out with friends on evenings to get drunk… neither of which this is suited for.

So while the author “missed the point”, your evaluation of use cases for this greatly misses the point too.