“Hi, you left this open, so me and the kids moved in”
“Hi, you left this open, so me and the kids moved in”
Also, and worthy of note, it rhymes with “bumper”, which is important if you want to say something like:
“Dancing at the disco, bumper to bumper. Wait a minute! Where’s me jumper?” (Youtube link)
It looks like one of those “vague, unsure” ones, it’s perhaps too old a word, and with too many vague, possible sources.
Some bits of dictionaries suggest various etymologies - it likely drifted from words in Gaelic, Scots, Arabic and French, like “jupe”, “jump”, “juppe” “jubbe” and so on, which tended to mean things like “smock”, “jacket” or whatever. It’s been around in English for various clothing types for a few hundred years, and referred specifically to the woollen pullover thing from the picture above for 100-150 years.
It has no relation at all to jump as in “leap”.
What would we call it? hallo-old-chum-you-fiend? my-good-friend-the-dishonourable-sir?
Is anyone posh using British Lemmy who can help advise?
This is true - especially if you were wearing a thick woolly jumper whilst doing it.
What does a jumper have to do with sweating?
A retired British footballer (generally considered a very good one), and England’s “great hope” in the 1998 Football World Cup.
“Little Michael Owen is England’s great hope, he’s only 18, and he’s playing in the World Cup. If we lose, we’ll blame everything on him. No pressure”.
I think so - he definitely played for Leeds. He must be in his 50s now, so maybe he’s took up journalism? :)
Should we make that the new community logo/banner?
Or Hocus Pocus, by Focus (youtube link)
✅️ Menacing scream at audience
✅️ As loud as possible
✅️ Crazy eyes
✅️ Flute
Okay, so I’ve just realised I’ve been pronouncing this wrong.
So I’ve been pronouncing it “chit in”, probably as above - perhaps halfway between “chicken” and “shit in”.
Apparently it’s pronounced “kite in”.
Not that it’s a word that crops up too much, but I’ve almost certainly made other people say it wrong too :(
Excellent news.
It may simply be the photographer/scanner used, or when it was taken. For example, ones in public ownership in the UK tend to all be photographed for artuk.org (the link is to other paintings by the same artist), with pretty consistent guidelines, so they all tend to be fairly consistent with each other in terms of colour, brightness, contrast etc - although ones taken as little as a few years ago may be completely different in visual quality. Ones in private ownership, or overseas galleries may be done with completely different lighting, settings and colour reproduction.
I think you’re going to need some Blackadder to go along with your Monty Python.
Start with the second series though, as the first series is a little weaker (the characters and style are a bit different), and might put you off.
‘A spokesman for Northern said “We are inexcusably greedy and both organisationally and morally corrupt. Our constant quest to trick people so we can punish, prosecute and fine them, at the expense of putting any effort into having more than 50% of our dirty, overcrowded trains actually turning up, means we’re not fit to run a train service and we need to be nationalised immediately”. “Our CEOs and upper management deserve to be ritually executed by being tied to train tracks by a moustache-twirling villain”, he added’.
I might have paraphrased a little bit, but essentially that’s what I heard them say.
People always post really awesome ones and make everyone else jealous, so here’s a disappointing one to make you all feel better:
There’s a mildly red patch in the middle.
Though it is indeed some kind of light, and the local region is definitely considered Northern, and therefore it’s definitely some form of Northern Light, it’s quite possible it’s not the sort of Northern Light we’re aiming for.
It’s probably just pollution or a stray bit of light from an event - though maybe I’m too early, and it’ll look awesome in a few hours?
[Edit] I’ve just looked at this photo on my computer and it’s far clearer - on my mobile (which I used to take it) the red was a barely visibly smudge in the dark sky.
I’m under the impression that pretty much all railway maps are based on, or developed from, the style of London Underground (also known as “The Tube”) maps from the 1930s onwards - so they all look kind of similar, because the designs all grew and developed from the same starting point.
On a similar note, with an “absolutely” and a word ending in “ed”, you get words which mean “very inebriated/stoned”
Common
Less common
I found it - it was used on an Expansion pack for Games Workshop’s Dark Future, and possibly some other Dark Future material.
Regarding your Robert Engel from previously, there’s a whole load of artists historically, who have virtually no information about them. If they weren’t famous whilst alive, who would bother to write down a biography at the time? Afterwards, you’re left with researching records from census, school, sales, newspapers, possible living relatives etc.
A lot of museums and galleries with permanent collections have 3 to 50 times as much stuff in stores as is on display. You’re not allowed to get rid of anything, but any year, you might receive another truck-load of badly labelled and badly maintained artworks from some rich bloke’s private collection, or someone’s tax write-off. You’d have to choose which ones get processed or researched first (after the existing backlog). Sometimes the information just isn’t there though - that’s why you get all those works that just get labelled “Unknown Man with a blue hat, likely Dutch School, circa 1650s”.
I think the information and documentation of such things is actually getting better, compared to pre-internet, certainly - but yeah, some people will have no information, and some will have information, but it’s still in a paper folder, waiting for someone to type it up :)