If Raffensperger doesn’t personally handcuff each board member he is Literally Hitler
Seriously though I would appreciate OP’s thoughts on what additional actions he should take
If Raffensperger doesn’t personally handcuff each board member he is Literally Hitler
Seriously though I would appreciate OP’s thoughts on what additional actions he should take
My mouse is on my dominant side so when I’m surfing porn I’m jerking non-dominant.
I would love to see a detailed technical explanation for how this would be possible.
I design battery-powered electronics for a living and I can’t think of any design that would let a battery explode with the violence these did, let alone on command. Unless it were deliberate.
IMO at least one of those omitted words was not unnecessary
That’s kind of an unnecessary leap.
The curve is clearly concave-down, indicating that, in fact, the number of facts per fact decreases as facts increase.
NYTimes reports that IDF claims Hamas killed them shortly before they were found. I thought I recalled seeing elsewhere that they were claimed to have been shot, but I can’t find that source at the moment.
Of course, how credible is the IDF?
How much do uou pay for the silver bulletin? I’d consider signing up if I could know the price before I enter my email address.
On the other hand, if it had been two women who had both agreed that the one cup was the worst ever, it would have been a sure thing.
From the article:
Conscientiousness, one of the Big Five personality traits, is defined as a tendency to control one’s impulses, be persistent, act dutifully, and live up to one’s obligations to others.
Conscientiousness has been linked to a variety of positive traits and behaviors, such as responsibility, dependability, hard work, goal orientation, self-control, and leadership. Some conscientious people, however, happen to be dogmatic, inflexible, unquestioningly obedient, and intolerant of uncertainty (i.e., they tend to see things in black-and-white).
How many times did you reboot it?
Nah, I was born in 1987, and 2012 is definitely when it went to shit with the “tea party”
Well I wasn’t conscripted to be on his detail (and neither were you) so i guess they didn’t do all they could
Thank mr skeltal
Yeah.
I fear that my original comment might be misconstrued so I just want to make it (probably annoyingly) explicit:
FWIW I fully believe Trump did this and worse, but that’s just me
The lawsuit itself appears to be real, not fake.
The allegations may not be true.
It’s subtle, but there’s a difference
I assume MFBR was supposed to be MFBC, and you can see their summary of why they assessed the Guardian that way Here
We’ve probably already seen the major stuff from the house committees investigation. If this does anything, it will only make it a little more fresh
Not even a concept of a plan?