• 145 Posts
  • 1.03K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2023

help-circle


  • I’m not a democrat. I’m not a racist weirdo. So I’d never fit in.

    I’m old school Republican but the party has taken a turn to just be an opposition party rather than actually having ideas.

    I fully support abortion publicly which makes me an outlier in the party. I don’t care if anyone is gay or trans which make me an outlier with the religious right. I’m for less spending which makes me an outlier with both parties.

    There really isn’t a viable party that economically conservative and socially more liberal. Some people say libertarians but most of them are just anti-tax people and I’m not opposed to taxes. There is a difference in wanting the lowest tax possible and those who oppose all taxes.



  • Uh… no, that’s my point. If electors are selected by a popular vote, that’s the vote. Very rare for electors to switch candidates

    Because 33 states have made laws which I think are unconditional. The electors are a check and balance of the system. The idea is to prevent the wrong type of person being elected.

    They also didn’t expect a party duopoly and hoped to avoid the current situation

    Not they did did. That’s something very uniquely American that grew and stuck. It’s a shame. More parties would be better.

    anti-democratic

    Our system was designed to be anti-democratic. We were designed to be a republic.

    If we were a democracy, being gay would still be a crime. We don’t want that. We have the constitution to help balance things out. People could vote for really bad ideas that destroy the country.









  • They’re selected by what you called a ‘popularity contest’.

    Historically they didn’t have to go off the popular vote. It is a check and balance that many states have abandoned.

    Why would my vote count for more in Wyoming than Florida?

    You are still missing who votes. You seem to think you vote, but it is really the state that votes. That is why your vote in Wyoming counts more.

    Large states still have way more power, so I’m not sure what that’s solving.

    but it is balanced by the other states. They don’t have as much clout as they could.

    How could that change under the current system, though?

    I don’t know that it can be changed in our current system but the swing states change over time. Florida use to be a swing state. Texas will become one in the next ten years or so. Maybe as early as after this election. THey went from a solid red to a light red.

    The left complains about this system because gives conservatives power disproportionate to their actual numbers,

    Not really. Since we are state based government, a popular vote would give to much power to blue states vs red states which are the majority of the country.


  • What? Within each state it’s a popularity contest. To a degree but maybe you forgot the electors? They have the controlling vote. In 33 states, there are laws against faithless electors, but the others do not.

    It sounds like you don’t understand how the system works or why it works the way it does. If you are not aware of electors then you really don’t get how the ELECTORAL college works.

    The idea that the US is a coalition of independent states made sense over 150 years ago or 250 years ago, but not so much now

    It makes more sense now than ever. That is the basic structure of our government. The 10th amendment even clarifies the power structure.

    As much as say, some idiots in Texas fantasize about it, states are not free to leave the US and it’s no different than any country made up of provinces.

    That is why we have the Electoral College. That way, each state will have a fair vote for president.

    The system also is super lame in how it makes the entire election come down to tens of thousands of votes in ‘swing states’.

    Now that is something I can agree with. It puts to much focus on a few states every few years since it is unlikely anyone will visit a solid red/blue state but the popular vote will lead to instability that would cause another civil war.

    It would also require a constitutional amendment, which would never pass. Most states would never pass a system that would diminish their power.

    It is something the left whines about but that isn’t going to change in our lifetime. You would 3/4 the states to agree to change it and that isn’t happening anytime soon.






  • They do make sense. We have a very stable government for a reason. A popular vote is something people who do understand the Constitution or the power of the states.

    Being president isn’t about being popular. It is about the states picking the person to represent them.

    We are a representative government. We are not a boy band where popularity matters.