• barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    357
    ·
    2 months ago

    Anyone else remember when new technology used to be fun and exciting instead of miserable?

    • lemmeout@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      118
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Long gone are the days when I used be excited to read update notes for new features… Now I just hope they don’t god damn force an update on me.

        • anton2492@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 months ago

          I use PurpleTV and it’s been great. It’s a Twitch fork modified to block ads, reduce bloat, and include customisation for chat, player and other components.

          Don’t know if we can share links here but the APK can be easily found online, still being updated semi-regularly. I won’t come back to the official app as long as I’m able. :)

          • PhreakyByNature@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Cheers for that. I had other third party apps way back in the day but they lacked some features. Will check it out.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just use Free and Open Source Software!

        It can always fuck up with updates, but usually you just get more free stuff and it’s awesome.

    • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Somewhere along the line, maybe the early to mid 2000’s they stopped making products “for” the end-user and flipped it around so the end-user (their data) is now the product, and the customers are governments, corporations, and share holders.

      • omarfw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because those shareholders (billionaires) and corporations drained the consumers of all of their money and now they’re the most profitable demographic to market to.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        shareholders

        If 0.000…01% shareholders count:

        Guessing a lotta us have a few bucks in index funds… suppose that ain’t cool, gotta find a principled fund.

        The most principled funds must only invest in like three companies cuz every corp has some problem.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s part of the reason why new community oriented projects are way more interesting to me now than most software. There are some outliers in the space who still have dedicated people in their craft rather than for money but it is fewer and farther between.

    • loam@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Absolutely. Although, this is just making old technology worse because web 3.0 and AI aren’t performing to corpo expectations.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what happens when you aren’t the (sole) paying customer.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    201
    ·
    2 months ago

    Soon: when you pause a video, it starts playing a video ad with audio, to make sure no silence time gets wasted from your speakers.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, uBlock Origin not working would take me from liking YouTube a fair bit to making it unusable.

        • I use Proton but keep legacy Gmail accounts around to ensure I still have access to accounts I may have forgotten about or people I knew a long time ago sending a stray email. The only other usage is logging into YouTube.
        • I use a Captcha solver extension.
        • I use uBlock Origin to block all their ads.
        • I don’t use their DNS.
        • I use DDG over their search engine and Firefox over their browser.
        • I don’t use Google Drive or their office suite (I think the latter is abysmal to use tbf).
        • I use DeepL over Translate.
        • I use NewPipe for YouTube on mobile and have a subscription to Nebula.
        • I no longer use Google Maps, opting for OSM instead.
        • I still use Android and unfortunately can’t unlock the bootloader but have degoogled as far as I know how, including never even registering a Google account with it (F-Droid + Aurora Store).

        YouTube is far and away the biggest means by which I interact with Google, and that falls off a cliff if I’m forced to interact with a mess of their ridiculously shitty ads every time I have to use it. uBO has likely saved hundreds of hours of watching ads over my lifetime (and probably thousands of dollars from not being subconsciously influenced by ads), and I’m not paying a subscription fee to such an unethical company to get rid of the ads. This would bring me from YouTube as a timewaster to YouTube only as strictly necessary. Even though I don’t support them directly through ads, I do support them by supporting creators I like monetarily, by sharing links and maintaining the network effect, and by giving them plenty of metadata by interacting with their service. If they do this, they ensure that I continue to monetarily support competitors like Nebula and permanently lose a grip they’ve had on me since I was a kid.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s what we need tbh. If people get fed up and leave then eventually creators will too

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If it doesn’t I will make something that records the entire f****** stream and removes the commercials out of it the old fashioned way If I have to. Not my first rodeo.

      • ironsoap@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yt-DLP and it’s variation (Seal, YTDLnis, etc.), newpipe and it’s variation (Tubular, Newpipe Sponsorblock, etc) already allow you to do this without having to get manual.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          And I use YTDLP now. At some point they will make it inoperable. I’m honestly surprised they haven’t sorted it out yet.

          • Life_inst_bad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            “Seal downloader” from the Playstore and “Seal” from F-Droid are 2 very different apps. One is a a clone riddled with ads, the other one is FOSS goodness. You are free to guess which is which.

      • Fester@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        I will find text versions of everything I need to learn about and create my own video, and then watch it.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          2 months ago

          Video content never changes, but the order and content of ads do. Automated browser, record the video 2-3 times. Diff the frames and slice out the ones that don’t match between runs.

          • mesamune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I remember back in the day, there was programs that would identify ads and remove them off on air programs. I would imagine something like that would be possible. Although at that point, just skipping the “platform” altogether might be a better solution.

        • rovingnothing29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          My guess: Youtube-dl derivative then an ffmpeg script to detect black frames that usually sandwich commercials on TV and delete the video inside those frames.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Most likely, I just dedicate an old laptop, a 4k HDMI capture device, store off MP4 and feed it through comskip then take it h265 and store it off.

          If I don’t do anything tricky with the browser they can’t detect that I’m doing anything tricky at all.

          The only thing I’m a little concerned about is that they’re going to start doing advertising like broadcast TV did and put quarter screen commercials up for other shows in the middle of running shows.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          So you want someone to broadcast, and you’re willing to pay for it, but not willing to support the content creators in any way?

          • parpol@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I would happily watch ads if they were non-intrusive and non-interrupting ads like side banners that don’t cause popups, or product placement inside videos.

            I would also pay for a platform where 100% of the money goes to paying for hosting and paying the creators.

            Neither of these things are happening, so yes, I would rather donate to support piracy.

  • someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Like way to kill your platform for anything educational where you want to pause to look at a graph.

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look at the article linked to it. It has a render of a pause ad being a banner that shrinks the video player somewhat, but the paused video is viewable.

        • Copernican@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          YouTube wants you to keep watching the videos. The more time you spend on the site the more ads you see. They care about finding the balance of acceptable ad load to maximize ad space, which requires a consistent user base. I have faith that this is their objective. Also, videos take time to load and a user hitting pause is unpredictable. A light weight display ad is probably the best technically feasible way to grab a user’s attention in that brief moment of hitting pause. Especially when pause means a user wants to mute audio to do things like take a phone call, a video would turn off users to the platform.

    • Jeffool @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Great point. I already find this to be a problem with the recommendations that pop up when paused, and the end-video elements they throw over everything despite having that turned off everywhere I can find it. It’s all so dumb. Just so damn dumb.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This already happened. People looking up CPR instructions because a loved one is dying, only to be met with three unskippable ads.

    Goodbye Meemaw.

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, that may be so, but priorities man. Priorities! Think of our profits man! In this harsh economy, ever ad counts! We’re only controlling 90% of the internet while we strive for 100%. That’s 10% short. 10%! We only had a revenue of 305 billion in 2023 which is not nearly enough to cut down on ads. Billionaire lives matter man! Come on, everybody, say it all together: Make millionaires billionaires again! Billionaires first! Meemaws don’t consume enough anyway. Screw her. By the way, want some penis enlargement pills?

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Proof? Aren’t there classes of videos non monetized on youtube? When I just google search for cpr and find the american red cross I quickly found written instructions as well as a youtube video that doesn’t appear to have any ads. Isn’t the problem that some video creators intentionally create videos for CPR in hopes of monetizing?

      • dch82@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        https://support.google.com/youtube/thread/83733719?hl=en

        This means as a creator that’s not in YPP [Youtube Partner Program], you may see ads on some of your videos. Since you’re not currently in YPP, you won’t receive a share of the revenue from these ads, though you’ll still have the opportunity to apply for YPP as you normally would once you meet the eligibility requirements.

        • Copernican@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Thanks for the checking. I think the whole argument is pretty wild and specious, and factually suspect, that someone died because a person couldn’t look up the cpr video on time. YouTube is not a platform that is meant to deliver on demand life saving training. In NYC all the restaurants and workplaces have signs up in designated areas with instructions on how to do cpr. I suspect someone is going to more quickly look up written instructions or infographics if they need to Google. But really, this just speaks to the importance in staying up to date on CPR practices and having school and HR classes that teach this on a recurring basis. Using this as an argument against all ads is kind of nuts.

          Also, the first step of most CPR instructions is call 911. So if you follow instructions, how are you watching a video on the phone? And can’t the operator coach you through the steps? https://www.redcross.org/take-a-class/cpr/performing-cpr/cpr-steps

    • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not defending YouTube here, but CPR is so time sensitive that if they were looking up instructions, she was a goner anyway.

      • baru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 months ago

        Have you had CPR training? What you stated isn’t true. Every second counts. But looking up instructions and seeing a easy video will still help massively.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly. It takes over a minute for permanent brain damage from a lack of oxygen, and it can take several, several minutes before actual death.

          CPR started anytime within that range will help keep the person alive, as you are literally forcing their body to intake oxygen and pump the blood.

          If you find someone without a heart beat and they aren’t already cold then call 911 and start cpr

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hey look, a blatant lie disguised as a fact!

        I wonder how this furthers your agenda…

  • x4740N@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 months ago

    And good people argue how adblock and sponssrblock are fair game for your shitty company practices

  • sentientity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s excellent that alternatives and ad blockers do exist but we need regulatory action to hold companies accountable for things that are designed to worsen user experience to pressure people into paying. It’s also a serious accessibility issue, to increasingly have everything be bright and loud and motion filled and unpausable all the time. This trend goes beyond YouTube and it sucks, we need to regulate this nonsense.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s pretty stupid to introduce ads on the pause screen. Usually I would pause something because I am either:

      A) Being interrupted and need to focus on something else like a phone call or a family member talking to me, and wouldn’t be paying attention to the screen anyways.

      B) Need to leave to go somewhere else like the fridge for a snack and wouldn’t be paying attention to the screen anyways.

      Or

      C) Just want to take a break and want to do something else which involves opening another window or program and wouldn’t be paying attention to the window with YouTube open.

      In every scenario where I pause YouTube and add playing would not provide any value to the entity paying YouTube to play the ad.

      And in every scenario, if an ad began playing when I pause youtube it would cause me to mute my sound and/or turn off my monitor and just cause me to get super annoyed at YouTube or at whatever product is being advertised and how to never buy it ever.

    • erenkoylu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      governments will not do anything that upsets the big companies like Google. Adblockers are are only defence against Google and others.

      • sentientity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Actually, good news, they have! Google just lost its search monopoly trial with the US government, and they seem to be about to lose their advertising monopoly trial too. The US FTC also just released a report (not a legal action) concluding that all the big companies have abused data collection and recommended that the government do something to make those practices unprofitable for companies. I know the EU has also been doing some significant stuff, both against apple specifically and big gatekeeper companies generally. You can certainly argue it’s not enough, and I would agree with you - but it’s given me some optimism that more action and real enforcement might be in the near future in many countries.

    • dezmd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      What a weird downslope of a take that will obviously result in authoritarian government power expansion and futher censorship.

      Just stop using it and support alternatives that dont do it. Have some self control.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Name a single viable alternative to YouTube at this point in time. Alternative frontends don’t count, since they still rely on YouTube to work. None of the creators I watch upload anywhere else.

      • sentientity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        People always say shit like this as if people don’t have a multitude of different life circumstances that affect and coerce how they interact with technology. That’s just how capitalism works. It’s not a matter of willpower. Privacy Bootstraps Theory is unhelpful. Being able to completely opt out of entrenched tech monopolies is a privilege. It’s great that you can do that, not everybody can.

      • Cadenza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Regulating capitalism = authoritarianism. What a weird take. Regulating capitalism =/= abolishing capitalism, this I can understand. But your take… wow.

      • Cyteseer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you think regulations are just blanket authoritarian actions. Sometimes we need government intervention to ensure and protect people’s rights.

  • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t most YouTubers make more money with their own sponsorships than from YT ads? Can we start the mass migration to PeerTube already?

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think Peertube would handle mass migration of Youtube creators, unless each and every one of them set up their own instance.

      • L3ft_F13ld!@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d honestly be curious to see how that plays out. Every creator hosts their own content while strengthening and spreading the Peertube network.

        I feel like that would quickly solidify it as a viable alternative.

          • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            In time the technical knowledge requirements may be reduced. I could see a small company selling pre-setup media servers with a couple TB of storage. Just plug it in, load up your videos and your basically done.

            And if you don’t have comments/users, there is little that needs to be maintained.

            It’s not perfect, but there will eventually be a point where YouTube becomes so enshitified that people begin to switch to alternatives.

            • pathief@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nah, your ISP doesn’t give you enough bandwidth to host your own mini YouTube. You vastly underestimate the bandwidth required to run the service. It’s massive, which is why PeerTube is having a hard time gaining traction.

        • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          This, my friends, is a classic lemmy argument: “how about someone whom I already don’t pay anything go and do more work for less pay, so I can enjoy my content free, without ads, and don’t need to bother with an AdBlock”.

          How about, you, anon, set up a server, provide a simple upload API, and convince your favorite content creator to upload there? Since it’s no costs for them and very little work, they might. Maintain that for a year, then we’ll talk.

          • figaro@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Then realize that YouTube was losing billions every year for over a decade, and that their current model is the only way it can be profitable for them 😅

            • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The unfortunate business model of the current tech world.

              And the only way to teach them to drop this BS is to migrate to a better thing as soon as the enshitification starts.

              I would’ve told you we shouldn’t have fallen into this trap to begin with, but that implies cooperation of the entire internet. And that ain’t happening.

              On the other hand, we can accept that this is how things are. We get years of free trial and pay for it in the next years. 13$/month is not an insane amount of money for the value provided. And it’s shared with creators in a transparent manner, so it’s not like they’re hording all of it either.

    • Tregetour@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      YT will likely attempt to play creators and viewers off one another. Similar to how hospitality does so with patrons and staff re: tips. You could see a FUD campaign aimed at anyone republishing their work on competitor sites.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      odysee can also be a option from peertube as well but odysees privacy policy they sell non pii data according to them if they dont sell user data we will be good

  • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are they so dumb They don’t realize that when we pause a video we are likely not watching or even near our fucking phone or screen at that time?

    • Drusenija@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They do, they’re probably just hoping the advertisers don’t and keep paying for more ad space.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They don’t care. If the advertisers pay for that spot then they make money! This has been the story with TV ads for decades.

    • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      They do, and they don’t care. The algorithm is actually tailored to find out if/when you fall asleep while watching videos, and then recommends longer videos in autoplay when it believes you are, because they’ll get to play you more ads and cash out more. When/if they implement pause ads advertisers will have an even bigger case against against yt inflating ad watch time to make more money. Facebook has this issue as well.

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The algorithm is actually tailored to find out if/when you fall asleep while watching videos, and then recommends longer videos in autoplay when it believes you are, because they’ll get to play you more ads and cash out more.

        You might be misremembering / misinterpreting a little there. This behavior is not intentional, it’s just a side effect of how the algorithm currently works. Showing you longer videos doesn’t equate to showing you more ads. On the contrary, if you get loads of short videos you’ll have way more opportunities to see pre-roll ads, but with longer videos, you’re just to just the mid-roll spots in that video. So YouTube doesn’t really have an incentive to make it work like that, it’s just accidental.

        Here’s the spiffing Brit video on this, which I think you might have gotten this idea from: https://youtu.be/8iOjeb5DTZI

        Edit: to be clear, I fully agree that YouTube will do anything to shove ads down our throats no matter how effective they actually are. I’m just saying that this example you’ve brought is not really that.

        • bruhSoulz@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Huh yea you’ve actually got a great point there. Also one of the YouTubers I watch is quite open about his knowledge on content creation and the algorithm and he once claimed yt knows when and to whom showing ads is beneficial, if you don’t mind sitting thru ads your supposedly more prone to get them, which is the reason why every time I’m using the official YouTube client for whatever reason I make sure to close and reopen the video as many times as it takes until I get it to start playing with no ads 😂 If that is true they’d def use that as an opportunity to roll out more ads cus no ones there to skip em

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Advertising these days is less of a way for websites and services to make free money.

      Of course websites and services that serve ads will deny this vehemently because advertisers who become aware of such practices (typically known as click fraud) will cut off those websites from ad revenue very quickly and stop serving ads there.

      The idea is to trick the advertising companies into thinking that we are there and we are watching, and we care, so that they will pay money to the website to display ads there.

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s the opposite. If you pause the video you the viewers are almost always looking at the screen. The pause button on a mobile phone or web browser is literally on the player. You are guaranteed to see it immediately after you push the button. You will see it when you un pause. These ads are display banners not video. It only takes a second to see the ad.

      Unlike video ads that just auto play, especially when the video player auto plays more videos, there probably is more probability you aren’t actually watching, unlike pause ads that require user activity and focus on the screen to push the pause button.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Google probably only spent months researching this and they only have all the tracking and user studies to know what you said. Please ignore the obvious fact that you are looking at the screen when you are pausing or resuming a video, KingJalopy knows better and Google is just dumb. Nobody will see any of these ads and they are adding them in vain.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d rather see them on pause screen than interrupting the playback but because we can’t have any nice things, interruptions will also only get worse.

      • Grenfur@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I guarantee you google isn’t interested in showing you one or the other. They want the revenue from both. My only question is, if you pause an ad, can you get another ad in your ad?

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I wonder what made their leadership continue to escalate into increasingly bullshit decisions. What happens if I need to pause because I need my PC to be quiet so I can address something and still an ad suddenly starts playing, completely interrupting what I wanted to address in a completely intrusive way? I’ll tell you what happens, I’ll either find some way to disable that from happening, switch to a service that doesn’t do it if I can, or just begin avoiding it all together.

    Brilliant planing, YouTube. Whoever has been left as its leadership is a dumbass.

    • Rider@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not to mention it’ll push more people towards using Adblockers. And since chrome is cracking down on Adblockers as well, people start using another browser altogether. It seems like Google is self-sabotaging with these kind of decisions.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Hilarious isn’t it? I stopped using Google search because they fucked it up too bad. I stopped watching YouTube years ago too because they already fucked it up.

        I guess they just don’t want users anymore.

        • Rider@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I guess they just don’t want users anymore.

          Actually, they do; it’s just that Google has become a bit short-sighted. They’ve started prioritizing short-term revenue over long-term growth and user experience.

          They seem to have forgotten that focusing on the long term and prioritizing user experience were the key factors that made them an internet giant in the first place.

          In any case, Google is a sinking ship. I’ll give them a max of seven years before they become the next Yahoo if they keep making incompetent decisions like this.

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      Whoever has been left as its leadership is a dumbass.

      Not in the slightest. More likely their annual bonus depends on boosting revenue right now. So they’re incentivised to generate short term increases in revenue but not for longer term. Plus, also, if/when Youtube goes tits up they’ll just get a different CEOing job (with “increased revenue by 25% in 2024 on their resume”) rinse and repeat.

    • ColonelPanic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Money.

      Also I imagine the ads will be silent but animated, like a regular website ad but full screen, essentially turning whatever you’re watching it on into a giant billboard.

      It’s just another thing to block I guess.

      • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I should have opened the article, that’s a lot less intrusive than what I thought. If this is the extent of it, and frankly considering that Google let’s you opt out of personalized tracking when many sites have begun forcing them onto users and forcing me to constantly clear their cookies, that makes me a lot less mad with them.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just gonna say I hate this when other apps do this. I pause cause I need to concentrate on something else. Showing an ad just makes that even harder. Now I have to pause AND close the app.