DDHQ made the call after declaring Trump the projected winner of Pennsylvania and Alaska, which got him to exactly 270 electoral votes.

  • MightyCuriosity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As a non US citizen I’m genuinely curious: how could people vote for this convicted, deranged, senile, racist, homophobic grandpa? Like what arguments do they use?

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Inflation. “The economy” was the #1 polled issue among Republicans by far. We saw this as well with Bush and Trump’s win in 2016 - for a lot of people, a scary amount, if you just promise “hey I’ll make the economy better.”

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Inflation.

      But I think racism and homophobia as well as religion is another big reason. It just was articulated a lot less by people.

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          No it means because the inflation happened on the watch of the Democrats that the Democrats are getting blamed for it even though a lot of it was caused by how Trump handled COVID.

          But US voters have a very short memory. And Trump is a very good liar.

          Also I forgot to mention gender played a huge role in this. A lot of this is about misogyny and racism underneath the surface.

          Unfortunately, the Democrats should have ran a white man. Because that’s the state of this country really.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You’re the only other person I’ve seen mention this at all. I said it earlier, you, me, everyone, everyone’s cousin, and also the FBI were very well aware that Trump & Co were definitely attempting to cheat the election, they’ve proven their intent to do so, and proper certification and electoral votes aren’t even until mid December. I don’t understand how this is possibly being uncontested right now. There are way less votes than everyone expected, it comes out in Trump’s favor with exactly the thin margin he needed to win, and everyone is just running with “Yep he’s won we know this 3 hours after election night there is no need to follow up further”

      I, for one, don’t believe a bit of this for at least the next month and expect some major findings in the next few weeks. I also might just be on the copium, who knows.

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I had so much hope for climate change and abortions rights and this burger man wins. Wtf is this state of world. The world will be on fire soon and the people can no longer do anything peaceful to stop it.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It is important to escape our self-built echo chambers. Many independent journalists and commentators spoke of an increase in minority support for Trump and Harris not reaching the Biden numbers.

      We must focus on building up a grassroots movement that is for the working class and moving away from the duopoly.

      Stay hopeful!

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Young people too. Being an asshole is starting to get popular again. And a running narrative has been that Trump’s policies were good, people just don’t like him because he’s an asshole. And 18 year olds don’t even remember the “grab them by the pussy” tape or anything he did that first year because they were 10.

    • Skeezix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Wtf is this state of world.

      US. State of the US. We don’t need latent american exceptionalism to add to the problem.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No, world. Where the US “leads” a lot of the rest of the world will follow, and the MAGAs are Hell-bent in leading us all off a +4°C cliff.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You are not wrong Russia invading Ukraine Isreal invading Palestine and kicking China playing games with Taiwan Everyone globally saying how but jobs like Trump are sprouting up. It hurts that I can’t see one place to go or feel safe from the muricans.

  • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Trump is the only US president to ever face and beat two female candidates. Quite the record if i must say

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    83
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is going to play out like 2016. The Left are to make every little thing. He does into the biggest baddest thing of all time. The world didn’t end in 2016, so why will it end now?

    • Player2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Trump literally caused the deaths of millions of Americans last time

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No one is expecting “world to end”. It’s just going to get somewhat shittier whereas it could have gotten better or at least stayed the same. Also for some minorities it’s going to get a lot shittier.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Honestly I do expect this term to be worse than the first. He had to temper his behavior and choices because he wanted to be reflected. Now there isn’t any chance of reelection so he will be more likely to do drastic things with no regard for the consequences.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        And for Ukraine and Gaza. So all those folks saying Kamala didn’t have a hard enough stance should be thrilled right now.

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I can’t imagine Palestinians are wrecked by this news. There’s a good chance it’ll get worse, but it’s still fairly ambiguous.

          I really wonder how Ukrainians feel though. This is a major win for Russia.

          • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 hours ago

            There’s indication Netanyahu wants to seize parts of Gaza into Israel. If it comes to that, there is no way Trump is going to do anything about it (except try to extract maximal gain for himself in terms of favors etc.)

            • Omega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I really, REALLY hate throwing “both sides” out there because it’s usually bullshit. But I don’t think there’s a chance in hell that any of the candidates would stop Israel from doing that. There’s barely a slim chance that either of the Dem nominees would have even done a damn thing more than lip service.

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          They wouldn’t be thrilled, either way. I hope the ones blindly supporting the Democrats pandering to the right are thrilled, instead.

    • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Historically that’s not necessarily the case. Authoritarians who come to power via somewhat democratic means in their first terms to be much more mild relative to subsequent terms where they solidify their hold on institutions.

      One notable example would be Putin’s first term (which is largely seen to be a fair win) or even when Medvedev was ordered to warm the seat. It always only gets worse, at least from historical examples.

      The bigger question is whether the US opposition has any willingness to fight, which I don’t believe to be the case.